Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

be2: improve number extraction #2609

Draft
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

be2: improve number extraction #2609

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

mike-hunhoff
Copy link
Collaborator

Prior the BinExport extractor was not emitting number features for complex operands, e.g. aarch64 instructions with logical shift operators.

@mike-hunhoff mike-hunhoff requested a review from a team February 19, 2025 22:41
Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please add bug fixes, new features, breaking changes and anything else you think is worthwhile mentioning to the master (unreleased) section of CHANGELOG.md. If no CHANGELOG update is needed add the following to the PR description: [x] No CHANGELOG update needed

@github-actions github-actions bot dismissed their stale review February 19, 2025 22:43

CHANGELOG updated or no update needed, thanks! 😄

@mike-hunhoff mike-hunhoff marked this pull request as draft February 19, 2025 23:05
Copy link
Collaborator

@williballenthin williballenthin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

seems reasonable. ideally we have some more tests to demonstrate how this does/nt affect parsing, but i dont think that can be addressed in this PR.

@mike-hunhoff
Copy link
Collaborator Author

seems reasonable. ideally we have some more tests to demonstrate how this does/nt affect parsing, but i dont think that can be addressed in this PR.

I don't think that the fix is going to be this simple. The modification above has exposed another bug in the expression tree building/pruning steps that I'm trying to track down now.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants