Rename resources indicators

[goergen95]

No description provided.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #71 (ba506a7) into main (926fceb) will increase coverage by 0.97%.
The diff coverage is 90.03%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #71      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   80.63%   81.60%   +0.97%     
==========================================
  Files          36       36              
  Lines        2473     2474       +1     
==========================================
+ Hits         1994     2019      +25     
+ Misses        479      455      -24     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
R/get_gfw_emissions.R	100.00% <ø> (ø)
R/get_gfw_lossyear.R	66.66% <ø> (ø)
R/get_gfw_treecover.R	93.33% <ø> (ø)
R/get_gmw.R	23.63% <0.00%> (ø)
R/get_nasa_srtm.R	55.17% <ø> (ø)
R/get_worldclim.R	47.50% <ø> (ø)
R/calc_biome.R	95.00% <50.00%> (ø)
R/get_nelson_et_al.R	50.00% <50.00%> (ø)
R/calc_precipitation_chirps.R	72.80% <73.68%> (ø)
R/calc_elevation.R	89.02% <80.00%> (ø)
... and 18 more

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 926fceb...ba506a7. Read the comment docs.

[goergen95]

Checks out fine now except the check on upstream packages. Let me investigate and have a proper review before merging.

[goergen95]

Checks are passing now. We could merge to main, I would suggest under version 0.2.0, because there are substantial changes to both public and private API. So after the merge I would quickly sent the package off to CRAN. I am thinking about a good timing for this since we already have sent an updated version to CRAN earlier this month... Is there anything else (like new indicators/resources) you are currently working on that we should wait for before merging?

[Ohm-Np]

May be we could add at least one another resource - fire occurence/burned area before next release. We have not decided yet which data source should we go with for this resource. For FIRMS, I have advanced a bit with the scripts but for MODIS burned area, it requires the use of Earthdata Login account and I haven't progressed much on establishing the connection using login credentials.

And as discussed earlier, should we include the workflows in technical details section like this diagram here? I have prepared similar diagrams for other indicators too, if it makes sense to include these in vignettes. If so, I could start writing this section and you could review and update the document.

[Ohm-Np]

@goergen95 we should may be merge this pull request, I will work on new branch for fire events and then push the changes from my side.