-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Add first version of first set of MeSH mappings #1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
This PR intends to add the first set of OBO Ontology (CL, UBERON, GO, OBA) term mappings to a set of MeSH terms.
Thanks @rays22 - My initial comments:
|
@matentzn would welcome your feedback too |
@jamesamcl , I will investigate this:
|
|
This commit intends to 1. update some of the mappings, and 2. add new MeSH Concept term mappings.
license: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ | ||
mapping_provider: https://www.ebi.ac.uk | ||
mapping_set_group: obo_mesh_mappings | ||
mapping_set_id: obo_mesh |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
FYI we already did a lot of mesh to OBO mappings in Biomappings (https://github.com/biopragmatics/biomappings) - it would be a shame not to reuse those |
Agreed! Should we mirror them here as SSSOM? |
Why mirror them? They have a PURL (https://w3id.org/biopragmatics/biomappings/sssom/biomappings.sssom.tsv) for anyone who wants to use them. I think it's a bit misguided to use GitHub as a place for mirroring data (is that what's going on with all of the repos in this org? I disagree with this) |
This PR intends to add the first set of OBO Ontology (CL, UBERON, GO, OBA) term mappings to a set of MeSH terms.