Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Solution #1004

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Solution #1004

wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

MarcusPy
Copy link

No description provided.

Copy link

@mateacademy-ai-mentor mateacademy-ai-mentor left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great job on your pull request! 🌟 Your annotations are well-defined, and the classes use dependency injection effectively. The parsing logic and service implementations are on point. Just a few suggestions to improve code quality and error handling have been provided, but they don't significantly impact the functionality of your code. Keep up the good work, and consider these tips for future enhancements! 👍

✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨

Comment on lines 30 to 31
throw new RuntimeException("Injection failed"
+ ", missing @Component annotation on the class " + clazz.getName());

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Instead of catching a general RuntimeException, it's better to use a more specific exception. Also, consider including the cause of the exception in the thrown exception to provide a stack trace for easier debugging.

if (field.isAnnotationPresent(Inject.class)) {
Object fieldInstance = getInstance(field.getType());
clazzImplementationInstance = createNewInstance(clazz);
try {

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The instance creation createNewInstance(clazz) should be checked before the fields injection loop to avoid unnecessary instance creation if any field injection fails. Move this line before the loop starts.

instances.put(clazz, instance);
return instance;
} catch (ReflectiveOperationException e) {
throw new RuntimeException("Can`t create a new instance of " + clazz.getName(), e);

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

When throwing an exception, it's better to use a more specific exception rather than a general RuntimeException. Also, include the cause of the exception in the thrown exception to provide a stack trace for easier debugging.

Copy link

@slade13 slade13 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good job! There are some comments left but they do not interfere with task description or common rules.

}
}
}
if (clazzImplementationInstance == null) {
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You're creating an instance of 'clazz' before checking if it's null. This can lead to NullPointerException if 'clazz' is null.

public class Injector {
private static final Injector injector = new Injector();
private static final Map<Class<?>, Class<?>> interfaceImplementations = Map.of(
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The current implementation of 'interfaceImplementations' map does not support multiple implementations of a single interface. Consider using a different data structure or strategy to support this.

throw new IllegalArgumentException("Injection failed"
+ ", missing @Component annotation on the class " + clazz.getName());
}
Object clazzImplementationInstance = createNewInstance(clazz);;
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There is a redundant semicolon at the end of the line.

}
}

private Class<?> findImplementation(Class<?> interfaceOrClazz) {
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

'findImplementation' method currently only supports interfaces. It will not return correct implementation if a class is passed as an argument.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants