Solution #1326
Solution #1326
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thank you for your submission! Your code is well-structured and meets most of the task requirements. However, there are a couple of critical issues that need to be addressed before we can approve the pull request:
-
Type Safety in
biteMethod: Thebitemethod should accept a parameter specifically of typeHerbivoreinstead ofAnimal. This change will ensure type safety and align with the method's logic, which is designed to interact withHerbivoreinstances. -
__str__Method Implementation: The__str__method is typically used as an instance method to provide a string representation of an object. In your code, it seems to be used as a class method. Consider renaming it to something more descriptive, likelist_alive_animals, or converting it to an instance method if it should represent an instance.
Once these issues are resolved, your code will be in great shape! Keep up the good work, and feel free to reach out if you have any questions. 😊
✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨
🔄 Fix the issues, commit the changes, and then re-request my review using the Re-request review button in the Reviewers tab.
app/main.py
Outdated
| @classmethod | ||
| def __str__(cls) -> str: | ||
| return "[" + ", ".join(repr(animal) for animal in cls.alive) + "]" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The __str__ method is typically an instance method, not a class method. Consider renaming this method to something more appropriate for a class method, like list_alive_animals, or converting it to an instance method if it should represent an instance.
app/main.py
Outdated
|
|
||
|
|
||
| class Carnivore(Animal): | ||
| def bite(self, herbivore: Animal) -> None: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The bite method should ideally accept a parameter of type Herbivore instead of Animal to ensure type safety, as the method logic specifically checks for Herbivore instances.
No description provided.