-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 117
Spec PR - MSC3266: Room Summary API #2125
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
…merged, and will be accepted into the spec shortly, ref: matrix-org/matrix-spec#2125
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for writing this! Looks ok overall, but a couple of questions.
- type: object | ||
properties: | ||
room_type: | ||
x-addedInMatrixVersion: # Overrides room_summary.yaml |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
room_summary.yaml
doesn't seem to define this anymore.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good catch, thanks. I restored x-addedInMatrixVersion: "1.4"
.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Would it make more sense to add the 1.4 into the hierarcy endpoint and treat this as all the data?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh! Actually, yes, setting the version only where it's needed is much less confusing than setting it in the central place and then unsetting it where it's not needed. Have made it so. Thanks for the suggestion.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Marbach <n0-0ne+github@mailbox.org>
8131b93
to
de6a7c6
Compare
de6a7c6
to
bf47879
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this is OK as is, but I did leave one question!
Looks great. Thank you! |
…merged, and will be accepted into the spec shortly, ref: matrix-org/matrix-spec#2125
Spec for MSC3266.
Piecing the information together from the MSC and weaving it into the existing publicRooms / hierarchy relationship was slightly nightmarish. Hopefully I haven't missed anything. A thorough review would be appreciated in any case.
Pull Request Checklist
Preview: https://pr2125--matrix-spec-previews.netlify.app