Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix råvestnik word family #50

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 12, 2024
Merged

Fix råvestnik word family #50

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 12, 2024

Conversation

noomorph
Copy link
Contributor

@noomorph
Copy link
Contributor Author

@vomindoraan piše:

råvěsnik → råvesnik
råvěsničsky → råvesničsky
råvěsničska sět́ → råvesničska sět́

(takože by bylo dobro dodati EN prěvod peer za immenik råvesnik)
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/r%C3%B3wie%C5%9Bnik#Polish
https://lexicography.online/etymology/%D1%80/%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B5%D1%81%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BA
• https://goroh.pp.ua/%D0%95%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%B3%D1%96%D1%8F/%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B5%D1%81%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BA
Nemaje jati v korenju

Prividno tuto jest ješče jedin slučaj, kȯgda dodavši slovo (pravdopodobno Jan) ględal na dnėšnjų poljskų formų i po vzoru na nju nevěrno prěnesl samoglåskų (tako kako s pečęt, kěšenj)

</lemma>
</synset>
<synset lang="en">
<lemma>coeval</lemma>
<lemma annotation="of same age">peer</lemma>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Myslim, da primětka tut ne je potrěbna: to može značiti peer i v obćem smyslu (kako i jest v dvoh izvedenyh iz njego slov).

Copy link
Contributor

@vomindoraan vomindoraan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@noomorph noomorph merged commit 1fb0b27 into main Dec 12, 2024
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants