Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upgrade: edac-utils version to 0.18 #10860

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: 3.0-dev
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

SumitJenaHCL
Copy link

@SumitJenaHCL SumitJenaHCL commented Oct 28, 2024

Merge Checklist

All boxes should be checked before merging the PR (just tick any boxes which don't apply to this PR)

  • The toolchain has been rebuilt successfully (or no changes were made to it)
  • The toolchain/worker package manifests are up-to-date
  • Any updated packages successfully build (or no packages were changed)
  • Packages depending on static components modified in this PR (Golang, *-static subpackages, etc.) have had their Release tag incremented.
  • Package tests (%check section) have been verified with RUN_CHECK=y for existing SPEC files, or added to new SPEC files
  • All package sources are available
  • cgmanifest files are up-to-date and sorted (./cgmanifest.json, ./toolkit/scripts/toolchain/cgmanifest.json, .github/workflows/cgmanifest.json)
  • LICENSE-MAP files are up-to-date (./LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/SPECS/data/licenses.json, ./LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/SPECS/LICENSES-MAP.md, ./LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/SPECS/LICENSE-EXCEPTIONS.PHOTON)
  • All source files have up-to-date hashes in the *.signatures.json files
  • sudo make go-tidy-all and sudo make go-test-coverage pass
  • Documentation has been updated to match any changes to the build system
  • Ready to merge

Summary

What does the PR accomplish, why was it needed?
The PR is to upgrade the edac-utils package to version 0.18

Change Log
  • SPECS-EXTENDED/edac-utils/13.patch
  • SPECS-EXTENDED/edac-utils/edac-utils.signatures.json
  • SPECS-EXTENDED/edac-utils/edac-utils.spec
  • cgmanifest.json
Does this affect the toolchain?

NO

Associated issues
  • #xxxx
Links to CVEs
Test Methodology
  • Pipeline build id: xxxx

@SumitJenaHCL SumitJenaHCL requested review from a team as code owners October 28, 2024 21:12
@reubeno reubeno added the specs-extended PR to fix SPECS-EXTENDED label Nov 22, 2024
@SumitJenaHCL SumitJenaHCL marked this pull request as draft January 2, 2025 10:54
@SumitJenaHCL SumitJenaHCL marked this pull request as ready for review January 2, 2025 11:17
@mfrw mfrw closed this Feb 11, 2025
@mfrw mfrw reopened this Feb 11, 2025
@microsoft-github-policy-service microsoft-github-policy-service bot added Packaging 3.0-dev PRs Destined for AzureLinux 3.0 labels Feb 11, 2025
Copy link
Member

@mfrw mfrw left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can we please address the github checks

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
3.0-dev PRs Destined for AzureLinux 3.0 Packaging specs-extended PR to fix SPECS-EXTENDED
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants