Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Fix binutils CVE-2025-1176 CVE-2025-1181 CVE-2025-1182 #12398

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Feb 14, 2025
Merged

Fix binutils CVE-2025-1176 CVE-2025-1181 CVE-2025-1182 #12398

merged 4 commits into from
Feb 14, 2025

Conversation

sindhu-karri
Copy link
Contributor

@sindhu-karri sindhu-karri commented Feb 14, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Merge Checklist

All boxes should be checked before merging the PR (just tick any boxes which don't apply to this PR)

  • The toolchain has been rebuilt successfully (or no changes were made to it)
  • The toolchain/worker package manifests are up-to-date
  • Any updated packages successfully build (or no packages were changed)
  • Packages depending on static components modified in this PR (Golang, *-static subpackages, etc.) have had their Release tag incremented.
  • Package tests (%check section) have been verified with RUN_CHECK=y for existing SPEC files, or added to new SPEC files
  • All package sources are available
  • cgmanifest files are up-to-date and sorted (./cgmanifest.json, ./toolkit/scripts/toolchain/cgmanifest.json, .github/workflows/cgmanifest.json)
  • LICENSE-MAP files are up-to-date (./LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/SPECS/data/licenses.json, ./LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/SPECS/LICENSES-MAP.md, ./LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/SPECS/LICENSE-EXCEPTIONS.PHOTON)
  • All source files have up-to-date hashes in the *.signatures.json files
  • sudo make go-tidy-all and sudo make go-test-coverage pass
  • Documentation has been updated to match any changes to the build system
  • Ready to merge
Summary

What does the PR accomplish, why was it needed?
Fix binutils CVEs CVE-2025-1176 CVE-2025-1181 CVE-2025-1182

Change Log
Does this affect the toolchain?

YES

Associated issues
  • #xxxx
Links to CVEs
Test Methodology

@microsoft-github-policy-service microsoft-github-policy-service bot added Packaging fasttrack/2.0 PRs Destined for AzureLinux 2.0 labels Feb 14, 2025
@sindhu-karri sindhu-karri force-pushed the sindhu/fix_binutils_CVEs branch from aa3c614 to 3bb4ebd Compare February 14, 2025 09:02
@sindhu-karri sindhu-karri marked this pull request as ready for review February 14, 2025 14:32
@sindhu-karri sindhu-karri requested a review from a team as a code owner February 14, 2025 14:32
@jslobodzian jslobodzian merged commit e0a210d into fasttrack/2.0 Feb 14, 2025
9 checks passed
@jslobodzian jslobodzian deleted the sindhu/fix_binutils_CVEs branch February 14, 2025 22:42
CBL-Mariner-Bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 14, 2025
@sindhu-karri @CBL-Mariner-Bot
Fix binutils CVE-2025-1176 CVE-2025-1181 CVE-2025-1182 (#12398)
df7b837 
Co-authored-by: jslobodzian <joslobo@microsoft.com>
(cherry picked from commit e0a210d)
@CBL-Mariner-Bot CBL-Mariner-Bot mentioned this pull request Feb 14, 2025
Open
@CBL-Mariner-Bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Auto cherry-pick results:

Auto cherry-pick pipeline run -> https://dev.azure.com/mariner-org/mariner/_build/results?buildId=736557&view=results

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@rikenm1 rikenm1 rikenm1 approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
fasttrack/2.0 PRs Destined for AzureLinux 2.0 Packaging
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
4 participants
@sindhu-karri @CBL-Mariner-Bot @rikenm1 @jslobodzian