-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14
[POC] Inspection changes to improve validation perf #257
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Draft
mattmasson
wants to merge
20
commits into
master
Choose a base branch
from
dev/improveInspectionScope
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
✅ Implemented Map pooling and optimized operations: - getPooledMap() with 50-map pool reduces allocations - createOptimizedShallowCopy() replaces new Map(entries()) - createOptimizedFilteredMap() replaces MapUtils.filter() - Strategic optimization of 4 critical Map bottlenecks 📊 Performance Results: - Before: 64.2s (Phase 5 baseline) - After: ~58s (average of 57.98s-59.98s) - Improvement: 14.1s faster (19.6% total improvement from 72.1s baseline) - Accuracy: 121 diagnostics, hash 398cb8c0 preserved ✅ 🚀 Total cumulative improvement: 72.1s → 58s = 14.1s (19.6% faster) 📈 Journal updated with Phase 6 results and technical details
✅ Implemented advanced scope caching strategy: - scopeResolutionCache with recursive resolution caching - Smart cache management with size limits (500 entries) - Cache persistence across inspections vs full clearing 📊 Performance Results: - Baseline (Phase 6): ~60s - Phase 7: ~60-66s (neutral impact) - Cache benefits limited by current validation patterns 🔍 Key Insights: - Scope resolution caching has minimal benefit for single-file validation - Core algorithm bottleneck may be deeper than scope resolution - Cache overhead outweighs benefits for current workload patterns 💡 Next: Shift to different optimization strategies for Phase 8
- Implemented canonical identifier storage instead of 4x variants - Added smart lookup with on-demand variant checking - Achieved ~75% scope map size reduction and massive performance gains - Performance: Synthetic docs now validate in ~18ms vs ~60s baseline - Trade-off: 46 test failures due to scope enumeration API changes - Proof-of-concept demonstrates huge potential, needs hybrid approach
- Restored Phase 7 baseline with proven compatibility - Added conservative optimizations maintaining exact original behavior - Cached scope item creation (4×N → N factory calls) - Added batch processing for filtered key-value pairs - Maintained original getAllowedIdentifiersOptions parameter - All 643 tests pass - perfect API compatibility preserved - Established stable foundation for future advanced optimizations
- Implemented intelligent threshold-based optimization (100 item threshold) - Small scopes (≤100): Full compatibility mode with all variants - Large scopes (>100): Selective optimization for recursive identifiers - Reduced 4× multiplication to ~2× for recursive items in large scopes only - Enhanced adaptive lookup handles mixed storage modes seamlessly - All 643 tests pass - perfect compatibility maintained - Smart balance: compatibility where needed, performance where valuable
…ation - Added architectural insights and algorithm deep dive - Included testing & validation methodology documentation - Provided future optimization roadmap with strategic directions - Added troubleshooting guide and maintenance guidelines - Documented lessons learned and best practices - Included performance monitoring and observability guidance - Added final recommendations for PowerQuery team - Comprehensive appendices with performance data and code references - Complete knowledge transfer documentation for SMEs
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
See the
.copilot-journal.md
file for details.Connector test file was removed from the branch but can be manually added locally. We should figure out an approach to generate a test file of similar complexity.