This gem is a tool you can use while developing your API to help consumers of your code to find bugs earlier and faster. It works like this: any time you write a method that could produce nil, you instead write a method that produces a wrapped value.
This library is in an early, experimental phase and may change suddenly and drastically. Backwards-compatibility should not be expected between releases, and the project may be cancelled at any time.
Here's an example along with how it can help with errors:
Say you have a collection of users along with a method for accessing the first user:
class UserCollection
def initialize(users)
@users = users
end
def first_user
@users.first
end
end
Now your friend uses your awesome UserCollection code:
class FriendGroups
def initialize(user_collections)
@user_collections = user_collections
end
def first_names
@user_collections.map do |user_collection|
user_collection.first_user.first_name
end
end
end
And then she tries it:
FriendGroups.new([UserCollection.new([])]).first_names
... and it promptly blows up:
NoMethodError: undefined method `first_name' for nil:NilClass
from (irb):52:in `first_names'
from (irb):51:in `map'
from (irb):51:in `first_names'
from (irb):57
But that's odd; UserCollection definitely has a #first_names
method, and we
definitely passed a UserCollection, and ... oooh, we passed no users, and so we
got nil
.
Right.
Instead what you want to do is wrap it. Wrap that nil. Make the user know that they have to consider the result.
class UserCollection
def initialize(users)
@users = users
end
def first_user
@users.first.wrapped
end
end
Now in your documentation you explain that it produces a wrapped value. And people who skip documentation and instead read source code will see that it is wrapped.
So they unwrap it, because they must. They can't even get a happy path without unwrapping it.
class FriendGroups
def initialize(user_collections)
@user_collections = user_collections
end
def first_names
@user_collections.map do |user_collection|
user_collection.first_user.unwrap_or('') {|user| user.first_name }
end
end
end
A wrapped value mixes in Enumerable. The functional world would say "that's a functor!". They're close enough.
This means that you can map
, inject
, to_a
, any?
, and so on over your
wrapped value. By wrapping it you've just made it more powerful!
For example:
irb(main):054:0> 1.wrapped.inject(0) {|_, n| n+1}
=> 2
irb(main):055:0> nil.wrapped.inject(0) {|_, n| n+1}
=> 0
And then we have flat_map
, which you can use to produce another wrapped object:
irb> 1.wrapped.flat_map {|n| (n + 1).wrapped}.flat_map {|n| (n*2).wrapped}.unwrap
=> 4
Those same people who will exclaim things about functors will, at this point, get giddy about monads. I mean, they're right, but they can relax. It's just a monad.
Those people ("what do you mean, 'those people'?!") may prefer the fmap
method:
irb> 1.wrapped.fmap {|n| n+1}.unwrap_or(0) {|n| n+4}
=> 6
Then we added some convenience methods to all of this. Here's a tour:
irb> require 'wrapped'
=> true
irb> 1.wrapped.unwrap_or(-1)
=> 1
irb> nil.wrapped.unwrap_or(-1)
=> -1
irb> 1.wrapped.present {|n| p n }.blank { puts "nothing!" }
1
=> #<Present:0x7fc570aed0e8 @value=1>
irb> nil.wrapped.present {|n| p n }.blank { puts "nothing!" }
nothing!
=> #<Blank:0x7fc570ae21c0>
irb> 1.wrapped.unwrap
=> 1
irb> nil.wrapped.unwrap
IndexError: Blank has no value
from /home/mike/wrapped/lib/wrapped/types.rb:43:in `unwrap'
from (irb):7
irb> 1.wrapped.present?
=> true
irb> nil.wrapped.present?
=> false
irb> nil.wrapped.blank?
=> true
irb> 1.wrapped.blank?
=> false
irb> 1.wrapped.unwrap_or(0) {|n| n * 100}
=> 100
irb> nil.wrapped.unwrap_or(0) {|n| n * 100}
=> 0
Inspired by a conversation about a post on the thoughtbot blog titled If you gaze into nil, nil gazes also into you.
Most ideas are from Haskell and Scala. This is not new: look into the maybe functor or the option class for more.
Copyright 2011 Mike Burns. Copyright 2014 thoughtbot.