Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: prepare release 0.4.20 #129

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 19, 2024
Merged

chore: prepare release 0.4.20 #129

merged 2 commits into from
Jun 19, 2024

Conversation

manu0466
Copy link
Contributor

Overview

This PR updates the project to release version 0.4.20 of both the staking and treasury contracts.

closes: #XXXX

What changes have been made in this PR?

  • [ ]

Checklist


  • Appropriate labels applied
  • Targeted PR against correct branch
  • Linked to Github issue with discussion and accepted design OR link to spec that describes this work.
  • Wrote unit and integration
  • Updated relevant documentation

@manu0466 manu0466 self-assigned this Jun 19, 2024
@manu0466 manu0466 requested a review from jaybxyz as a code owner June 19, 2024 08:39
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 19, 2024

Walkthrough

In this update, various configuration files and code structures have been refined within a Rust workspace. Specifically, version updates were made in Cargo.toml files, and the MigrateMsg enum was refactored into a struct in the treasury contract module, enhancing the organization and consistency of the project.

Changes

File Change Summary
Cargo.toml Updated workspace package version from "0.4.19" to "0.4.20".
contracts/treasury/Cargo.toml Transitioned package metadata fields to use workspace = true for better consistency and centralized configuration. Added several new fields also set to workspace = true.
contracts/treasury/src/msg.rs Refactored MigrateMsg from an enum to a struct to possibly simplify and clarify its representation.

Sequence Diagrams

The changes described are primarily structural and configurational enhancements, rather than functional modifications; therefore, sequence diagrams are not applicable.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between bd2d7d2 and 05f4b5c.

Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • Cargo.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
Files selected for processing (3)
  • Cargo.toml (1 hunks)
  • contracts/treasury/Cargo.toml (1 hunks)
  • contracts/treasury/src/msg.rs (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
  • Cargo.toml
  • contracts/treasury/Cargo.toml

contracts/treasury/src/msg.rs Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@rustcandy rustcandy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@RiccardoM RiccardoM merged commit 792fe53 into main Jun 19, 2024
1 check passed
@RiccardoM RiccardoM deleted the manuel/release-0.4.20 branch June 19, 2024 14:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants