-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 40
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: Improved variable handling for config #332
Open
bombsimon
wants to merge
1
commit into
mirumee:main
Choose a base branch
from
bombsimon:remote-schema-url-env-var
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I didn't add support for
${}
because I think it's confusing to have it without proper matching. Try$TEST_VAR}
or${TEST_VAR
. Also consider variables like$1WOOT
. I think of simple expressions, mine (\$([A-z][A-z0-9_]*)
) is a bit more optimal.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Environment variables tend to come from a shell such as
bash
orzsh
where${VAR}
is a common usage and even required if you want a variable like${foo}bar
which wouldn't work with your suggestion.I didn't do any complex matching to ease maintenance, using something like
$TEST_VAR}
would just break your own code and I don't know why one would do that. I guess worst case we hide a configuration issue since it would successfully replace it if$TEST_VAR
is defined.If we want to actually check for this I think just adding two options would be easiest, something like,
\${([\w_]+)}|\$([\w_]+)
would require either${VAR}
or$VAR
.What should be considered you mean? I know it's not a valid variable in
bash
but do you mean if someone want's to use the literal we shouldn't replace it? Seems unlikely to me but can be fixed with something like\${([A-z][A-z0-9_]*)}|\$([A-z][A-z0-9_]*)
. It's a trade-off I guess that I thought wasn't worth it but I'm open to change it if the owners agree.Previous owners didn't even want this feature in so we'll see if this will even be considered 😺
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, this type of regex is what I was alluding to with both points. I'm afraid you can't use multiple match groups with your approach. See #349 for a suggestion if proper
${}
support is desired.As I said, I don't think it's a good idea to stick with a weird, non-standard notion of variables that confuses users and doesn't save on parsing complexity.
If they stick to it, it would at least be worth documenting to avoid head-banging.
/cc @mat-sop