Skip to content

Conversation

@google-labs-jules
Copy link
Contributor

πŸ’‘ What:
Optimized the EQEffect class in src/intuitive_daw/audio/processor.py by implementing a caching mechanism for filter design. Specifically, the signal.butter call and gain calculations are now performed only when the relevant parameters (low_freq, sample_rate, low_gain) change, rather than for every process() call.

🎯 Why:
Filter design (calculating coefficients) is a computationally expensive operation involving trigonometric and polynomial calculations. Doing this per audio block (which happens very frequently in real-time audio processing) is inefficient and consumes unnecessary CPU cycles, especially when parameters remain static most of the time.

πŸ“Š Measured Improvement:

  • Baseline: ~0.31s for 100 iterations of processing 1 second of audio.
  • Optimized: ~0.24s for the same workload.
  • Improvement: ~22% reduction in processing time for the EQ effect.

This change reduces the CPU overhead of the EQ effect significantly, allowing for more instances to be used or leaving more headroom for other processing tasks. Correctness was verified via new unit tests ensuring that parameter changes still trigger updates and output remains correct.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 5322564243082139395 started by @lightmyfireadmin

- Implemented caching for `sos` (second-order sections) and gain values in `EQEffect` to avoid expensive recalculation on every audio block.
- Coefficients are only updated when `low_freq`, `sample_rate`, or `low_gain` parameters change.
- Added comprehensive unit tests in `tests/test_audio_processor.py` covering initialization, processing logic, and parameter updates.
- Added `tests/conftest.py` to mock heavy dependencies for isolated testing.
- Benchmarks show ~22% performance improvement (from ~0.31s to ~0.24s for 100 iterations of 1s audio).
@google-labs-jules
Copy link
Contributor Author

πŸ‘‹ Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a πŸ‘€ emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

@codacy-production
Copy link

Codacy's Analysis Summary

36 new issues (≀ 0 issue)
12 new security issues
5 complexity
0 duplications

Review Pull Request in Codacy β†’

✨ AI Reviewer available: add the codacy-review label to get contextual insights without leaving GitHub.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant