Skip to content

Conversation

@google-labs-jules
Copy link
Contributor

πŸ’‘ What: Optimized VisualCNN.classify in visual-analysis.worker.ts to transfer ownership of input tensors instead of cloning them.
🎯 Why: The previous implementation used tf.clone() to persist the current frame as previousFrame, causing unnecessary GPU memory allocation and data copying every frame. It also had a potential memory leak where currentFrame wasn't disposed if an error occurred.
πŸ“Š Impact: Reduces GPU memory churn by one tensor per frame (significant for high-FPS analysis). Fixes a potential GPU memory leak in error paths.
πŸ”¬ Measurement: Verified with unit tests that tf.clone is no longer called and that proper disposal occurs on error.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 2749104100583949463 started by @lightmyfireadmin

- Removed unnecessary `tf.clone()` in `VisualCNN.classify` by transferring ownership.
- Fixed potential memory leak in error handling path.
- Fixed linting error in `switch` statement.
@google-labs-jules
Copy link
Contributor Author

πŸ‘‹ Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a πŸ‘€ emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

@codacy-production
Copy link

Codacy's Analysis Summary

0 new issue (≀ 0 issue)
0 new security issue
0 complexity
0 duplications

Review Pull Request in Codacy β†’

✨ AI Reviewer available: add the codacy-review label to get contextual insights without leaving GitHub.

@mitchlabeetch mitchlabeetch marked this pull request as ready for review January 18, 2026 15:52
@mitchlabeetch mitchlabeetch merged commit 7038f78 into main Jan 18, 2026
7 of 8 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants