fix bib

references.bib

@@ -839,7 +839,7 @@ @article{struppek2023jair
 @article{stammer2023learning,
   Anote = {./images/stammer2023learning.png},
   title = {Learning by Self-Explaining},
-  author={Wolfgang Stammer and Felix Friedrich and David Steinmann Manuel Brack and Hikaru Shindo and Kristian Kersting},
+  author={Wolfgang Stammer and Felix Friedrich and David Steinmann and Manuel Brack and Hikaru Shindo and Kristian Kersting},
   journal = {Transactions on Machine Learning Research (TMLR)},
   Note = {Artificial intelligence (AI) research has a long track record of drawing inspirations from findings from biology, in particular human intelligence. In contrast to current AI research that mainly treats explanations as a means for model inspection, a somewhat neglected finding from human psychology is the benefit of self-explaining in an agents' learning process. Motivated by this, we introduce a novel learning paradigm, termed Learning by Self-Explaining (LSX). The underlying idea is that a learning module (learner) performs a base task, e.g. image classification, and provides explanations to its decisions. An internal critic module next evaluates the quality of these explanations given the original task. Finally, the learner is refined with the critic's feedback and the loop is repeated as required. The intuition behind this is that an explanation is considered "good" if the critic can perform the same task given the respective explanation. Despite many implementation possibilities the structure of any LSX instantiation can be taxonomized based on four learning modules which we identify as: Fit, Explain, Reflect and Revise. In our work, we provide distinct instantiations of LSX for two different learner models, each illustrating different choices for the various LSX components. We broadly evaluate these on several datasets and show that Learning by Self-Explaining not only boosts the generalization abilities of AI models, particularly in small-data regimes, but also aids in mitigating the influence of confounding factors, as well as leading to more task specific and faithful model explanations. Overall, our results provide experimental evidence of the potential of self-explaining within the learning phase of an AI model.},
   Keywords = {Explanatory Interactive Machine Learning, XIL, Explainability, XAI, Interpretability},