Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add a rule about DLRM training data shuffling #440

Closed

Conversation

tgrel
Copy link

@tgrel tgrel commented Apr 21, 2021

Shuffling rules about DLRM were not clear enough in the v0.7 round and they left a lot of room for interpretation. This update makes a clear rule that is easy to follow and should not impact convergence or performance of DLRM implementations.

@github-actions
Copy link

MLCommons CLA bot:
Thank you for your submission, we really appreciate it. We ask that you sign our MLCommons CLA and be a member before we can accept your contribution. If you are interested in membership, please contact membership@mlcommons.org .
0 out of 1 committers have signed the MLCommons CLA.
@tgrel
You can retrigger this bot by commenting recheck in this Pull Request

@johntran-nv
Copy link
Contributor

Closing this one because of CLA issues. I opened #441 to replace it.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 21, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants