Ignore whitespace issues in upgrade notes yml

[andrewnicols]

No description provided.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 25.94%. Comparing base (dc590a5) to head (52d531e).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

❗ There is a different number of reports uploaded between BASE (dc590a5) and HEAD (52d531e). Click for more details.

HEAD has 1 upload less than BASE

Flag	BASE (dc590a5)	HEAD (52d531e)
remote_branch_checker	1	0

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #309      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   32.99%   25.94%   -7.05%     
==========================================
  Files          71       71              
  Lines        3222     3222              
==========================================
- Hits         1063      836     -227     
- Misses       2159     2386     +227     

Flag	Coverage Δ
check_upgrade_savepoints	0.46% <ø> (ø)
checkstyle_manipulations	0.00% <ø> (ø)
compare_databases	2.38% <ø> (ø)
continuous_manage_queues_validation	0.71% <ø> (ø)
define_excluded	1.11% <ø> (ø)
detect_conflicts	1.48% <ø> (ø)
diff_extract_changes	0.00% <ø> (ø)
git_sync_two_branches	2.04% <ø> (ø)
grunt_process	3.01% <ø> (ø)
illegal_whitespace	2.63% <ø> (ø)
list_valid_components	0.00% <ø> (ø)
mustache_lint	2.82% <ø> (ø)
mustache_lint_plugins	1.30% <ø> (ø)
php_lint	1.21% <ø> (ø)
prepare_npm_stuff	1.52% <ø> (ø)
remote_branch_checker	?
remote_branch_reporter	0.00% <ø> (ø)
setup	0.00% <ø> (ø)
thirdparty_check	1.45% <ø> (ø)
travis-branch-checker	0.00% <ø> (ø)
upgrade_external_backup	1.61% <ø> (ø)
verifications	0.00% <ø> (ø)
verify_commit_messages	2.63% <ø> (ø)
verify_phpunit_xml	1.24% <ø> (ø)
versions_check_set	5.02% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[sarjona]

Hi @andrewnicols!
Thanks a lot for working on this improvement. The patch looks good and it's great you covered with tests. Well done!

There are a couple of tests failing, but they are unrelated to the patch, so I'm going to merge this (and then, in a separate issue, we can try to fix them).

Thanks @stronk7 for your help!! :-*