Add eth outbound queue and system pallets #742
Conversation
tmpolaczyk
changed the title
WASM runtime size check:Compared to target branchdancebox runtime: 1412 KB (no changes) ✅ flashbox runtime: 832 KB (no changes) ✅ dancelight runtime: 2056 KB (no changes) ✅ container chain template simple runtime: 1088 KB (no changes) ✅ container chain template frontier runtime: 1388 KB (no changes) ✅ |
…egate-message-origin
Coverage Report@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master tomasz-generic-aggregate-message-origin +/- ##
===========================================================================
- Coverage 65.44% 65.16% -0.28%
+ Files 309 310 +1
+ Lines 53985 54234 +249
===========================================================================
+ Hits 35328 35339 +11
+ Misses 18657 18895 +238
|
tmpolaczyk
changed the title
| @@ -14,6 +14,10 @@ | |||
| // You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License | |||
| // along with Tanssi. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/> | |||
|
|
|||
| use snowbridge_core::outbound::Fee; | |||
| use snowbridge_core::outbound::SendError; | |||
| use frame_support::ensure; | ||
| use frame_support::traits::{Defensive, ProcessMessage, ProcessMessageError}; | ||
| use frame_support::weights::WeightMeter; | ||
| use snowbridge_pallet_outbound_queue::MessageLeaves; |
|
|
||
| #[pallet::call_index(2)] | ||
| #[pallet::weight(T::WeightInfo::force_inject_slash())] | ||
| pub fn root_test_send_msg_to_eth( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It's only for testing, and ensure_root, what's the point of benchmarking it?
| type Balance = Balance; | ||
| type WeightToFee = WeightToFee; | ||
| type WeightInfo = (); | ||
| //type WeightInfo = crate::weights::snowbridge_pallet_outbound_queue::WeightInfo<Runtime>; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
put proper weight info benchmarked
| type GetAggregateMessageOrigin = GetAggregateMessageOrigin; | ||
| type MessageQueue = MessageQueue; | ||
| type Decimals = ConstU8<12>; | ||
| type MaxMessagePayloadSize = ConstU32<2048>; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
it seems to be this will be not enough, maybe we should double it.
in the case of 100 validators, 32 byte per validator account * 100 is already 3200...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We decided not to do this and instead send the message in batches, correct?
| type Helper = benchmark_helper::EthSystemBenchHelper; | ||
| type DefaultPricingParameters = Parameters; | ||
| type InboundDeliveryCost = (); | ||
| //type InboundDeliveryCost = EthereumInboundQueue; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
same thing with benchmarks
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I will do benchmarks when the PR is ready, as they are time consuming
|
Upstream changes look good, waiting for a potential PR opening and approval |
No description provided.