Conversation
|
Important Review skippedAuto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Summary of Changes
Hello @wlgns12370, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
I've updated the application's whitelist configuration to refine which API endpoints are publicly accessible or require specific authentication. This change involves modifying the Whitelist enum to include new paths and adjusting the security requirements for an existing user-related API endpoint.
Highlights
- Whitelist Refinement: The
Whitelist.javaenum has been updated to adjust the set of paths that bypass security filters. This includes moving an existing path and adding new ones for user ID checks and customer keys. - API Security Enhancement: The
/api/v1/user/customer-keyendpoint inUserControllernow explicitly requires authenticated users with the 'USER' role, enhancing security for this specific API.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments or fill out our survey to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request aims to update the API whitelist. While it correctly adds some public endpoints and applies a security rule to the /user/customer-key endpoint, it also incorrectly adds this newly secured endpoint to the whitelist. This conflict will prevent the security rule from working as intended and will likely cause runtime errors. The endpoint should be removed from the whitelist to fix this critical issue.
| NOTICE("/api/v1/notice", WhitelistMethod.GET); | ||
| NOTICE("/api/v1/notice", WhitelistMethod.GET), | ||
| USER_ID_CHECK("/api/v1/user/check-id", WhitelistMethod.GET), | ||
| CUSTOMER_KEY_CHECK("/api/v1/user/customer-key", WhitelistMethod.GET), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This line adds the /api/v1/user/customer-key endpoint to the whitelist, which is intended for public endpoints that don't require authentication. However, another change in this pull request adds a @PreAuthorize annotation to the getCustomerKey method in UserController, which is meant to secure this exact endpoint. These changes are contradictory. An endpoint cannot be both whitelisted (public) and require authentication. To fix this, please remove this line. The endpoint should be secured as per the change in UserController.
1 participant
✨ 구현한 기능