Conversation
|
Important Review skippedAuto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Summary of Changes
Hello @wlgns12370, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
I've implemented a change to make certain exam-related API endpoints publicly accessible. This involves updating the application's security configuration to whitelist these endpoints and removing the explicit authorization checks that previously restricted access based on user authentication and roles. The goal is to allow broader access to exam information.
Highlights
- Whitelist Expansion: I've expanded the application's security whitelist to include several new GET endpoints related to exam information. Specifically,
/api/v1/exam,/api/v1/exam/areas, and/api/v1/exam/allare now accessible without requiring authentication. - Authorization Removal: I've removed the
@PreAuthorizeannotations from thegetExams(),getByArea(), andgetDistinctAreas()methods within theExamController. This change means that these API endpoints no longer require users to be authenticated or possess specific roles (like 'ADMIN' or 'USER') to access them.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments or fill out our survey to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request aims to make certain exam-related endpoints public by adding them to the whitelist and removing method-level security annotations. The changes in ExamController are correct, but there are critical issues in the Whitelist.java file. The whitelisted paths have a typo ('exam' instead of 'exams') and the order of declaration will cause incorrect matching due to the use of startsWith. I've provided a suggestion to fix these issues.
| EXAM("/api/v1/exam", WhitelistMethod.GET), | ||
| EXAM_AREAS("/api/v1/exam/areas", WhitelistMethod.GET), | ||
| EXAM_ALL("/api/v1/exam/all", WhitelistMethod.GET), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There are two issues with the new whitelist entries that will prevent them from working as intended:
-
Incorrect Path: The
ExamControlleris mapped to/exams(plural), but the whitelist paths use/exam(singular). For example, a request to/api/v1/exams/allwill not be matched by/api/v1/exam/all. -
Incorrect Matching due to Order: The whitelist check uses
requestUri.startsWith(path). Because of this, a request to/api/v1/exams/allwould be incorrectly matched by the/api/v1/examsrule if it appears first in the enum, as"/api/v1/exams/all".startsWith("/api/v1/exams")is true. More specific paths must be declared before less specific ones to be matched correctly.
I've provided a suggestion that corrects the paths to use exams and reorders the entries to ensure correct matching.
| EXAM("/api/v1/exam", WhitelistMethod.GET), | |
| EXAM_AREAS("/api/v1/exam/areas", WhitelistMethod.GET), | |
| EXAM_ALL("/api/v1/exam/all", WhitelistMethod.GET), | |
| EXAM_ALL("/api/v1/exams/all", WhitelistMethod.GET), | |
| EXAM_AREAS("/api/v1/exams/areas", WhitelistMethod.GET), | |
| EXAM("/api/v1/exams", WhitelistMethod.GET), |
1 participant
✨ 구현한 기능