prod : DiscordNotifier 를 통한 에러 실시간 알림 및 부분 포맷 변경#237
Conversation
…dler for better readability
|
Important Review skippedAuto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Summary of Changes
Hello @polyglot-k, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
I've refactored the global exception handling logic to improve code organization and enhance the clarity of Discord exception notifications. The primary goal was to streamline how exceptions are processed and communicated, ensuring that critical alerts are more informative and easier to understand. This change focuses on internal code structure and external notification presentation.
Highlights
- Exception Handling Refactor: Relocated the notifyIfNeeded method within GlobalExceptionHandler for better code structure and simplified the @ExceptionHandler annotation for AuthenticationException by removing the fully qualified class name.
- Discord Notification Update: Modified the Discord exception notification message, changing the prefix from "❌ 알림 전송 실패" to "
⚠️ 알림 전송" and refining its overall formatting for improved clarity.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments or fill out our survey to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request refactors exception handling and notification logic. My review focuses on a critical issue with ambiguous exception handlers that could prevent the application from starting, a high-severity issue with potential NullPointerExceptions in the notification logic, and a medium-severity suggestion to improve string formatting for better performance and readability. The changes to the notification message text and code organization are reasonable.
| @ExceptionHandler(AuthenticationException.class) | ||
| public ResponseEntity<ErrorResponse> handleCustomAuthenticationException( | ||
| life.mosu.mosuserver.global.exception.AuthenticationException ex) { | ||
| AuthenticationException ex) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This change introduces an ambiguity in exception handling. Both this method (handleCustomAuthenticationException) and handleAuthenticationException (line 72) now handle AuthenticationException.class.
Due to the import import org.springframework.security.core.AuthenticationException; on line 14, AuthenticationException.class resolves to org.springframework.security.core.AuthenticationException.class. This results in two handlers for the same exception, which will cause an IllegalStateException at runtime and prevent the application from starting.
To fix this, you should revert to using the fully qualified class name for your custom AuthenticationException to distinguish it from Spring's AuthenticationException.
| @ExceptionHandler(AuthenticationException.class) | |
| public ResponseEntity<ErrorResponse> handleCustomAuthenticationException( | |
| life.mosu.mosuserver.global.exception.AuthenticationException ex) { | |
| AuthenticationException ex) { | |
| @ExceptionHandler(life.mosu.mosuserver.global.exception.AuthenticationException.class) | |
| public ResponseEntity<ErrorResponse> handleCustomAuthenticationException( | |
| life.mosu.mosuserver.global.exception.AuthenticationException ex) { |
| DiscordExceptionNotifyEventRequest request = DiscordExceptionNotifyEventRequest.of( | ||
| ex.getCause().toString(), | ||
| ex.getMessage() | ||
| ); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The call ex.getCause().toString() on line 155 will throw a NullPointerException if ex.getCause() returns null. Many exceptions are thrown without a cause, which would make this notification logic fail silently (the NPE would be caught and logged, but the original exception notification would not be sent).
To make the notification more robust, you should handle the case where the cause is null.
| DiscordExceptionNotifyEventRequest request = DiscordExceptionNotifyEventRequest.of( | |
| ex.getCause().toString(), | |
| ex.getMessage() | |
| ); | |
| DiscordExceptionNotifyEventRequest request = DiscordExceptionNotifyEventRequest.of( | |
| ex.getCause() != null ? ex.getCause().toString() : "N/A", | |
| ex.getMessage() | |
| ); |
| return "⚠️ **알림 전송**\n" | ||
| + String.format("- ⚠️ exception Cause : `%s`\n", exceptionCause) | ||
| + String.format("- 📨 exception Message: `%s`\n", exceptionMessage) | ||
| + String.format("- 📋 meta: `%s`", meta == null ? "없음" : meta); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Using the + operator for string concatenation can be inefficient as it creates multiple intermediate String objects. For better performance and readability, you can use a single String.format() for the entire message template.
If you are using Java 15+, you could also consider using a text block with the .formatted() method for even better readability.
| return "⚠️ **알림 전송**\n" | |
| + String.format("- ⚠️ exception Cause : `%s`\n", exceptionCause) | |
| + String.format("- 📨 exception Message: `%s`\n", exceptionMessage) | |
| + String.format("- 📋 meta: `%s`", meta == null ? "없음" : meta); | |
| return String.format("⚠️ **알림 전송**\n- ⚠️ exception Cause : `%s`\n- 📨 exception Message: `%s`\n- 📋 meta: `%s`", | |
| exceptionCause, | |
| exceptionMessage, | |
| meta == null ? "없음" : meta); |
This pull request refactors exception handling and notification logic in the global exception handler, and updates the formatting of Discord exception notification messages. The main changes include moving the
notifyIfNeededmethod, simplifying exception handler annotations, and revising the notification message content.Exception handling refactor:
notifyIfNeededmethod from the top of theGlobalExceptionHandlerclass to the bottom, improving code organization. [1] [2]@ExceptionHandlerannotation forAuthenticationExceptionby removing the fully qualified class name, making the code cleaner and easier to read.Notification message update: