Conversation
|
Important Review skippedAuto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Summary of Changes
Hello @jbh010204, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
I'm submitting this pull request to enhance our application's data validation and error handling mechanisms. The core changes involve upgrading our phone number validation by introducing a new, more comprehensive annotation that ensures phone number fields are both correctly formatted and non-empty. Additionally, I've improved the specificity of error responses for invalid gender inputs, leading to a more consistent and user-friendly experience.
Highlights
- Enhanced Phone Number Validation: I've introduced a new custom annotation,
@NotBlankPhoneNumberPattern, which combines both pattern matching for phone number format and a check to ensure the field is not blank. This provides a more robust and consolidated validation for phone number inputs. - Migration to New Validation Annotation: I've migrated all relevant DTOs and request objects across the application to utilize the new
@NotBlankPhoneNumberPatternannotation for their phone number fields. This ensures consistent and improved validation across various user inputs. - Improved Gender Input Error Handling: I've refined the error handling for invalid gender inputs by integrating a custom exception (
CustomRuntimeException) and a specific error code (ErrorCode.INVAILD_GENDER). This provides clearer and more consistent error responses for users.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments or fill out our survey to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request introduces a composite validation annotation @NotBlankPhoneNumberPattern to streamline phone number validation, which is a good improvement for code reuse. It also refactors exception handling for invalid gender values to use a custom exception type. My review includes a fix for a typo in an error code, an improvement to the error message in the new validation annotation, and the removal of some redundant annotations that arose from these changes.
| .findFirst() | ||
| .orElseThrow( | ||
| () -> new IllegalArgumentException("Invalid gender name: " + genderName)); | ||
| () -> new CustomRuntimeException(ErrorCode.INVAILD_GENDER)); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Following the correction of the typo in ErrorCode from INVAILD_GENDER to INVALID_GENDER, this line should be updated to use the correct enum constant.
| () -> new CustomRuntimeException(ErrorCode.INVAILD_GENDER)); | |
| () -> new CustomRuntimeException(ErrorCode.INVALID_GENDER)); |
| USER_INFO_INVALID(HttpStatus.BAD_REQUEST, "유효하지 않은 사용자 정보입니다."), | ||
| USER_NOT_ACCESS_FORBIDDEN(HttpStatus.BAD_REQUEST, "접근 권한이 없는 사용자입니다"), | ||
| USER_SAVE_FAILED(HttpStatus.INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR, "사용자 저장에 실패했습니다."), | ||
| INVAILD_GENDER(HttpStatus.BAD_REQUEST, "유효하지 않은 성별 값입니다."), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There's a typo in the enum constant name. It should be INVALID_GENDER instead of INVAILD_GENDER. This improves code clarity and prevents potential confusion. Please ensure all usages of this enum constant, such as in Gender.java, are updated accordingly.
| INVAILD_GENDER(HttpStatus.BAD_REQUEST, "유효하지 않은 성별 값입니다."), | |
| INVALID_GENDER(HttpStatus.BAD_REQUEST, "유효하지 않은 성별 값입니다."), |
| @Pattern( | ||
| regexp = "^01[016789]-\\d{3,4}-\\d{4}$", | ||
| message = "전화번호 형식은 010-XXXX-XXXX 이어야 합니다." | ||
| ) | ||
| @NotBlank | ||
| @Target({ElementType.FIELD, ElementType.PARAMETER}) | ||
| @Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME) | ||
| @Constraint(validatedBy = {}) | ||
| public @interface NotBlankPhoneNumberPattern { | ||
|
|
||
| String message() default "전화번호 형식은 010-XXXX-XXXX 이어야 합니다."; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The current error message is specific to pattern violations and might be confusing if the validation fails because the phone number is blank. A more comprehensive message that covers both NotBlank and Pattern violations would be better. Consider updating the message in both the @Pattern annotation and the default message() to inform the user about both requirements.
| @Pattern( | |
| regexp = "^01[016789]-\\d{3,4}-\\d{4}$", | |
| message = "전화번호 형식은 010-XXXX-XXXX 이어야 합니다." | |
| ) | |
| @NotBlank | |
| @Target({ElementType.FIELD, ElementType.PARAMETER}) | |
| @Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME) | |
| @Constraint(validatedBy = {}) | |
| public @interface NotBlankPhoneNumberPattern { | |
| String message() default "전화번호 형식은 010-XXXX-XXXX 이어야 합니다."; | |
| @Pattern( | |
| regexp = "^01[016789]-\\d{3,4}-\\d{4}$", | |
| message = "전화번호는 필수이며, 형식은 010-XXXX-XXXX 이어야 합니다." | |
| ) | |
| @NotBlank | |
| @Target({ElementType.FIELD, ElementType.PARAMETER}) | |
| @Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME) | |
| @Constraint(validatedBy = {}) | |
| public @interface NotBlankPhoneNumberPattern { | |
| String message() default "전화번호는 필수이며, 형식은 010-XXXX-XXXX 이어야 합니다."; |
| @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ public record SignUpAccountRequest( | |||
|
|
|||
| @Schema(description = "휴대폰 번호", example = "010-1234-5678", required = true) | |||
| @NotBlank(message = "휴대폰 번호는 필수입니다.") | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The @NotBlank annotation here is redundant because the @NotBlankPhoneNumberPattern composite annotation already includes @NotBlank. You can remove this line to avoid redundancy and rely on the validation provided by @NotBlankPhoneNumberPattern.
| @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ public record SignUpProfileRequest( | |||
|
|
|||
| @Schema(description = "휴대폰 번호", example = "010-1234-5678", required = true) | |||
| @NotBlank(message = "휴대폰 번호는 필수입니다.") | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The @NotBlank annotation here is redundant because the @NotBlankPhoneNumberPattern composite annotation already includes @NotBlank. You can remove this line to avoid redundancy and rely on the validation provided by @NotBlankPhoneNumberPattern.
1 participant
✨ 구현한 기능
📢 논의하고 싶은 내용
🎸 기타