Skip to content

Comments

MOSU refactor: enhance OAuth2 login failure handling with redirect#305

Merged
wlgns12370 merged 1 commit intoprodfrom
develop
Aug 10, 2025
Merged

MOSU refactor: enhance OAuth2 login failure handling with redirect#305
wlgns12370 merged 1 commit intoprodfrom
develop

Conversation

@wlgns12370
Copy link
Contributor

✨ 구현한 기능

  • api 연동을 위한 oauth 실패 스펙 변경

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 10, 2025

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch develop

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@wlgns12370 wlgns12370 merged commit 3b4d9c4 into prod Aug 10, 2025
2 checks passed
Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @wlgns12370, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

I've refactored the OAuth2 login failure handling to improve API integration. Instead of returning a JSON error response, the system will now redirect the user to a predefined URL, passing serialized failure data as a query parameter. This change streamlines the client-side handling of authentication failures by providing a consistent redirect mechanism.

Highlights

  • OAuth2 Failure Redirection: Modified OAuth2LoginFailureHandler to perform a client-side redirect upon authentication failure, moving away from direct JSON error responses.
  • Dynamic Redirect Data: The LoginResponse object is now serialized to JSON, URL-encoded, and included as a data query parameter in the redirect URL, allowing the client to parse failure details.
  • LoginResponse Utility: Added a new static from() method to LoginResponse to facilitate the creation of an empty response object specifically for OAuth2 login failure scenarios.
  • Simplified Error Reporting: Removed the previous verbose error response generation logic, simplifying the failure handling flow within the backend.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments or fill out our survey to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request refactors the OAuth2 login failure handling to redirect to the frontend instead of returning a 401 error. The changes are in the right direction, but I've identified a couple of important issues in the new OAuth2LoginFailureHandler. Specifically, it's missing crucial error logging and uses a hardcoded redirect URL, which harms maintainability and flexibility. I've provided a detailed comment with a code suggestion to address these high-severity issues. Additionally, I've suggested a minor improvement to rename a factory method for better code clarity. Overall, the changes are good but require these fixes to be robust and production-ready.

Comment on lines +30 to +40
LoginResponse loginResponse = LoginResponse.from();
String jsonResponse = UriUtils.encode(objectMapper.writeValueAsString(loginResponse),
StandardCharsets.UTF_8);

if (exception instanceof OAuth2AuthenticationException oAuth2Ex) {
OAuth2Error error = oAuth2Ex.getError();
errorCode = error.getErrorCode();
errorMessage = error.getDescription() != null ? error.getDescription() : errorCode;
final String redirectWithAccessToken = UriComponentsBuilder.fromUriString(
"https://www.mosuedu.com/auth/kakao/redirect")
.queryParam("data", jsonResponse)
.build()
.toUriString();

log.info("OAuth2 Error: {}, Description: {}", error.getErrorCode(),
error.getDescription());
}

ErrorResponse errorResponse = ErrorResponse.builder()
.status(HttpStatus.UNAUTHORIZED.value())
.message("인증에 실패했습니다")
.errors(errorMessage)
.code(errorCode)
.build();

response.setStatus(HttpServletResponse.SC_UNAUTHORIZED);
response.setContentType("application/json;charset=UTF-8");
response.setContentType(MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON_VALUE);

objectMapper.writeValue(response.getWriter(), errorResponse);
response.sendRedirect(redirectWithAccessToken);

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

high

This method can be improved in several ways:

  1. Missing Failure Logging: The AuthenticationException is ignored. It's crucial to log authentication failures for security monitoring and debugging.
  2. Hardcoded Redirect URL: The redirect URL is hardcoded, which is inflexible for different environments or clients. It should be derived from the state parameter in the request, similar to OAuth2LoginSuccessHandler.

I've included a suggested implementation that addresses these points. This suggestion also anticipates renaming LoginResponse.from() to LoginResponse.createForFailure() for better clarity (see my other comment on LoginResponse.java).

To apply this suggestion, you will also need to:

  • Copy the parseState private method from OAuth2LoginSuccessHandler into this class.
  • Add the necessary imports for Map, HashMap, and REDIRECT_PARAM_KEY.
        log.warn("OAuth2 Authentication failed: {}", exception.getMessage());

        LoginResponse loginResponse = LoginResponse.createForFailure();
        String jsonResponse = UriUtils.encode(objectMapper.writeValueAsString(loginResponse),
                StandardCharsets.UTF_8);

        final String state = request.getParameter("state");
        final Map<String, String> stateParams = parseState(state);
        final String redirectUri = stateParams.getOrDefault(REDIRECT_PARAM_KEY, "/");

        final String redirectUrl = UriComponentsBuilder.fromUriString(redirectUri)
                .queryParam("data", jsonResponse)
                .build()
                .toUriString();

        response.sendRedirect(redirectUrl);

Comment on lines +25 to +27
public static LoginResponse from() {
return new LoginResponse(null, null);
}

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

The method name from() is ambiguous for creating a failure response, especially since other from methods handle success cases. To improve code clarity and make the method's purpose self-documenting, consider renaming it to something more descriptive, like createForFailure().

Suggested change
public static LoginResponse from() {
return new LoginResponse(null, null);
}
public static LoginResponse createForFailure() {
return new LoginResponse(null, null);
}

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant