Conversation
…d filter payments by DONE status
…n PaymentJpaRepository
|
Note Other AI code review bot(s) detectedCodeRabbit has detected other AI code review bot(s) in this pull request and will avoid duplicating their findings in the review comments. This may lead to a less comprehensive review. Important Review skippedAuto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Summary of Changes
Hello @polyglot-k, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
I've refined the refund processing logic to ensure that payment statuses are correctly updated rather than deleted upon a successful refund. This change also improves the accuracy of refund calculations by only considering completed payments.
Highlights
- Payment Status Update: Upon successful refund processing, the associated PaymentJpaEntity is now updated to PaymentStatus.ABORTED instead of remaining in its previous state.
- Refund Calculation Accuracy: The getTotalPaymentCount method now specifically filters for payments with PaymentStatus.DONE to ensure only successfully completed payments are included in refund quantity calculations.
- Payment Record Management: The explicit deletion of payment records after a refund has been removed, aligning with the new approach of updating payment status.
- Repository Enhancements: Added findByExamApplicationId to retrieve payment entities and modified findByPaymentKey to findByPaymentKeyAndPaymentStatus for more precise querying based on payment status.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments or fill out our survey to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request refactors the refund process to use a soft-delete approach for payments by changing their status to ABORTED instead of physically deleting them. This is a good change for data integrity and auditing. The logic for calculating refund amounts is also improved to only consider completed payments. My review includes suggestions to improve logging practices and to reorder operations for better adherence to the fail-fast principle.
| log.info("target payment log : {}", targetPayment); | ||
|
|
||
| int totalQuantity = getTotalPaymentCount(paymentKey); | ||
|
|
||
| log.info("total quantity log : {}", totalQuantity); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
These log statements appear to be for debugging. It's recommended to use the DEBUG level for such detailed tracing to avoid cluttering INFO logs in production environments. INFO logs are generally reserved for significant application state changes.
| log.info("target payment log : {}", targetPayment); | |
| int totalQuantity = getTotalPaymentCount(paymentKey); | |
| log.info("total quantity log : {}", totalQuantity); | |
| log.debug("target payment log : {}", targetPayment); | |
| int totalQuantity = getTotalPaymentCount(paymentKey); | |
| log.debug("total quantity log : {}", totalQuantity); |
| refundJpaRepository.save(refundEntity); | ||
| PaymentJpaEntity payment = paymentJpaRepository.findByExamApplicationId( | ||
| targetPayment.examApplicationId()) | ||
| .orElseThrow(() -> new CustomRuntimeException(ErrorCode.PAYMENT_NOT_FOUND)); | ||
|
|
||
| payment.changeStatus(PaymentStatus.ABORTED); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It's a good practice to fetch required entities and perform validations before making state changes like saving a new entity. By fetching the PaymentJpaEntity before saving the RefundJpaEntity, you can fail faster if the payment is not found, avoiding an unnecessary database operation that would be rolled back anyway. This improves clarity and follows the fail-fast principle.
| refundJpaRepository.save(refundEntity); | |
| PaymentJpaEntity payment = paymentJpaRepository.findByExamApplicationId( | |
| targetPayment.examApplicationId()) | |
| .orElseThrow(() -> new CustomRuntimeException(ErrorCode.PAYMENT_NOT_FOUND)); | |
| payment.changeStatus(PaymentStatus.ABORTED); | |
| PaymentJpaEntity payment = paymentJpaRepository.findByExamApplicationId( | |
| targetPayment.examApplicationId()) | |
| .orElseThrow(() -> new CustomRuntimeException(ErrorCode.PAYMENT_NOT_FOUND)); | |
| refundJpaRepository.save(refundEntity); | |
| payment.changeStatus(PaymentStatus.ABORTED); |
…ateVirtualAccountProcessor
1 participant
✨ 구현한 기능
📢 논의하고 싶은 내용
🎸 기타