Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Planning Pipeline Refactoring] #1 Simplify Adapter - Planner chain #2429
[Planning Pipeline Refactoring] #1 Simplify Adapter - Planner chain #2429
Changes from 7 commits
602e859
315e29c
3332826
f03c6ac
e191169
0d6c008
0a0ff26
15fbf04
910eecc
e8c2d54
232b479
9ede94f
a4ae7d7
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What's the point of removing the forward declaration?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It is done in planning_scene.h. Why shouldn't the planning-interface class depend on planning_scene, have I missed a circular dependency that is introduced by this?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@henningkayser I am wondering if we should get rid of this. OMPL is the only planner that uses this interface (and has distinguishable processing steps as far as I know) and in the planning pipeline we don't use it anyways. Rather than enforcing this interface on all planners we should consider a custom solution for OMPL
This file was deleted.