Skip to content

Conversation

@prakhargupta1
Copy link
Member

@prakhargupta1 prakhargupta1 commented Jun 24, 2025

@prakhargupta1 prakhargupta1 added the website Pages that are not documentation-related, marketing-focused. label Jun 24, 2025
@mui-bot
Copy link

mui-bot commented Jul 17, 2025

Netlify deploy preview

https://deploy-preview-46416--material-ui.netlify.app/

Bundle size report

Bundle Parsed size Gzip size
@mui/material 0B(0.00%) 0B(0.00%)
@mui/lab 0B(0.00%) 0B(0.00%)
@mui/system 0B(0.00%) 0B(0.00%)
@mui/utils 0B(0.00%) 0B(0.00%)

Details of bundle changes

Generated by 🚫 dangerJS against ac8dba0

@mbrookes
Copy link
Member

mbrookes commented Dec 9, 2025

@prakhargupta1, don't miss these additional comments: #46416 (review) 😉

@prakhargupta1
Copy link
Member Author

  • There are several mentions of a UI "framework", which isn't strictly accurate. Prefer "library" or "foundation" instead?

Replaced framework -> library.

  • For the block quotes could we put the quotation mark vertically in line with the text? It looks a bit lost at the moment (and also lacks padding above it). That said, the blue vertical bar already identified it as a quote. Do we need both?

Removed the quotation mark.

  • There are quite a few "MUI X Data Grid Premium", which is a bit of a mouthful. Should we drop the "Premium" (not sure the tier is important for these case studies), and perhaps even the MUI X in places?

MUI X Data Grid Premium -> Data Grid. Removed MUI X and Premium/Pro from all occurrences. Also, at some places Data
Grid was mentioned in bold, removed that as well.

  • Should recommendations such as "Moz strongly recommends" be attributed as a quote? Otherwise it sounds like we're putting words in customers' mouths...

Added it in a quote and removed 'strongly'.

  • There's a mix of "UX" and "user experience" in the text. Should we pick one? (No strong opinion.)

Replaced user experience -> UX wherever it made sense.

@mbrookes
Copy link
Member

Thanks @prakhargupta1 Let me know when the rest of the feedback has been addressed, and I'll take another look

@prakhargupta1
Copy link
Member Author

prakhargupta1 commented Dec 16, 2025

Thanks @prakhargupta1 Let me know when the rest of the feedback has been addressed, and I'll take another look

@alelthomas, I'm assuming you're looking into the rest of the styling related feedback but let me know if there is something that I should check.
I'm hopeful that we'll be able to finally merge it this week.

@alelthomas
Copy link
Contributor

alelthomas commented Dec 17, 2025

RE: styling suggestions on the Testimonials grid. I'm not sure I love centering Loggi + Particle, it looks off:
CleanShot 2025-12-17 at 11 20 41@2x

vs doing space-around (as opposed to space-between which is what I had before). This looks slightly better to me, but lmk:
CleanShot 2025-12-17 at 11 22 40@2x

@alelthomas
Copy link
Contributor

Made a bunch of little adjustments to tackle Matt and Nora's feedback too:

  • Rearranged the Spotlight grid so it's 2 rows of 2 and 1 of 4 (2 of 2 and 1 of 3 on tablet)
  • Logos should render without issue now (lmk if you stumble into anything else)
  • Added header image for MOZ and standardized logos
  • Fixed padding for mobile / tablet
  • Tweaks to the Testimonials grid: fixed Particl logo being a different color, fixed positioning for gridArea one (Particl and Loggi), adjusted padding disparity between Docker and Unity logos, removed outline and borders on Avatars
  • Logo slider: scrunched them up a bit horizontally and rearranged so wider logos are right next to the shorter ones. Sped up animation on mobile

Let me know if I missed anything. @prakhargupta1

@prakhargupta1
Copy link
Member Author

Some things that I noticed:

  • Title is missing in the Moz story.
  • We need to change the logo for Delivery hero https://github.com/mui/material-ui/pull/46416/files#r2594691653
  • In the Tebra card, Read Story button is not aligned with the rest.
  • Let's also add alt-text in Athena and Oregon, we may have to show them in the future for a visual balance.

Just my 2 cents on the design:

  • The Testimonial grid looks unbalanced to me as there is a lot of text at the bottom. I'd preferred Particl and Loggi, to be vertically centered.

Everything else looks good to me 🙌

@alelthomas alelthomas merged commit 8679ca6 into mui:master Dec 18, 2025
19 checks passed
@prakhargupta1 prakhargupta1 deleted the case-studies branch December 19, 2025 08:17
@mbrookes
Copy link
Member

mbrookes commented Dec 27, 2025

I'd preferred Particl and Loggi, to be vertically centered.

I had suggested the same thing. It still looks off to me.

Current:

image

Proposed:

image

On a related(ish) note, there are double borders where adjacent divs meet.

There's a layout shift when a case study header image loads.

And something I hadn't paid enough attention to – the CTA at the bottom reads:

Find out why MUI's tools are trusted by thousands of open-source developers and teams around the world.
[Discover the Core libraries >]

  1. The case studies are all commercial/closed-source use, rather than open-source, and presumably that's who we're targeting?
  2. Given that all of the case studies feature MUI X in one form or another, is Core the best place to link? Apart from anything else, the Core page features Joy UI, which in turn is called out as "in beta and development is currently on hold." Probably not the best look...

Edit to add: Nitiest of nitpicks, but the Delivery Hero logo is vertically much smaller than the others in this set:

image

John Dere also, but less noticeably so. Seems we've squeezed those to fit 100px wide (300px intrinsic), and lost height as a result.

Please could we have a quick follow-up PR to work through these niggles?

@alelthomas
Copy link
Contributor

RE testimonials section, this was the approved design months ago designed by Nora and Victor:

CleanShot 2026-01-02 at 13 34 08

I personally like the original option better, but the implementation I went for seemed like a good compromise - but I shall open the discussion again with the rest of the team to avoid bias.

I've opened a new PR to address the rest: #47555

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

website Pages that are not documentation-related, marketing-focused.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants