Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ISSUE #1263]🔨Optimize TopicConfig encode📝 #1264

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 21, 2024
Merged

Conversation

mxsm
Copy link
Owner

@mxsm mxsm commented Nov 21, 2024

Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)

Fixes #1263

Brief Description

How Did You Test This Change?

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Improved handling of the topic_name field to prevent panics when the value is absent.
    • Enhanced formatting for topic_filter_type for better representation in encoded strings.
  • Tests
    • Added a new test module with multiple unit tests for the TopicConfig struct, covering default values, creation methods, encoding, decoding, and message type retrieval.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 21, 2024

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request modify the encode method of the TopicConfig struct located in rocketmq-common/src/common/config.rs. The updates enhance the handling of the topic_name field by ensuring it clones the value before applying a default if it is None, preventing potential panics. Additionally, the formatting of the topic_filter_type has been updated from a debug format to a display format. A new test module has also been added to include multiple unit tests for the TopicConfig struct.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
rocketmq-common/src/common/config.rs Modifications to encode method in TopicConfig: improved handling of topic_name, updated formatting for topic_filter_type, and addition of a test module with unit tests.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Optimize TopicConfig encode (Issue #1263)

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

approved, auto merge, feature

Suggested reviewers

  • TeslaRustor
  • SpaceXCN

🐰 In the meadow, changes bloom,
With topic_name no longer gloom.
A clone to keep the panic at bay,
And formatted strings in bright array.
Hooray for code, so neat and bright,
Let's hop along, all feels just right! 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot added this to the v0.4.0 milestone Nov 21, 2024
@rocketmq-rust-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

🔊@mxsm 🚀Thanks for your contribution 🎉. CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first 🔥

@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot added AI review first Ai review pr first ready to review waiting-review waiting review this PR labels Nov 21, 2024
@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot added the enhancement⚡️ New feature or request label Nov 21, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
rocketmq-common/src/common/config.rs (1)

124-129: Consider using as_ref() to avoid unnecessary cloning

The current implementation clones the Option's content before applying the default. While this works, it introduces unnecessary overhead when the Option contains a value.

Consider this more efficient alternative:

-        sb.push_str(
-            self.topic_name
-                .clone()
-                .unwrap_or(CheetahString::empty())
-                .as_str(),
-        );
+        sb.push_str(
+            self.topic_name
+                .as_ref()
+                .map_or_else(CheetahString::empty, |s| s)
+                .as_str(),
+        );
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9f4e51e and 278db01.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • rocketmq-common/src/common/config.rs (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
rocketmq-common/src/common/config.rs (1)

137-137: Verify Display implementation and format compatibility

The change from debug format to display format is more idiomatic, but requires verification:

  1. Ensure TopicFilterType implements Display trait
  2. Verify if any downstream systems depend on the previous debug format
✅ Verification successful

Format change is safe - Display trait is properly implemented

TopicFilterType correctly implements the Display trait with clear string representations:

  • SINGLE_TAG for SingleTag variant
  • MULTI_TAG for MultiTag variant

The change from debug to display format is safe as it provides a consistent string representation. No downstream dependencies were found that rely on the encoded format.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if TopicFilterType implements Display
ast-grep --pattern 'impl Display for TopicFilterType'

# Find potential downstream dependencies on the encoded format
rg -l 'TopicConfig.*encode' --type rust

Length of output: 626

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 21, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 18.85%. Comparing base (9f4e51e) to head (aba7e4d).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1264      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   18.52%   18.85%   +0.32%     
==========================================
  Files         428      428              
  Lines       53726    53818      +92     
==========================================
+ Hits         9953    10145     +192     
+ Misses      43773    43673     -100     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.


🚨 Try these New Features:

@rocketmq-rust-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

🔊@mxsm 🚀Thanks for your contribution 🎉. CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first 🔥

@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot added approved PR has approved auto merge and removed ready to review waiting-review waiting review this PR labels Nov 21, 2024
@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot merged commit 1a5dc31 into main Nov 21, 2024
20 of 21 checks passed
@mxsm mxsm deleted the op-1263 branch November 24, 2024 13:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
AI review first Ai review pr first approved PR has approved auto merge enhancement⚡️ New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Enhancement⚡️] Optimize TopicConfig encode
3 participants