Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ISSUE #1283]⚡️Optimize name server DefaultRequestProcessor #1284

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 24, 2024

Conversation

mxsm
Copy link
Owner

@mxsm mxsm commented Nov 24, 2024

Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)

Fixes #1283

Brief Description

How Did You Test This Change?

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Improved error handling for topic registration and request processing.
    • Enhanced type safety in topic retrieval methods.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Adjusted method signatures for better concurrency and access control.
  • Documentation

    • Updated logging and warning messages for clarity during topic registration.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 24, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve modifications to the DefaultRequestProcessor and RouteInfoManager implementations within the RocketMQ nameserver. Key updates include improved error handling in request processing methods and adjustments to method signatures to enhance type safety and concurrency management. Specifically, the handling of request headers and bodies has been refined, and the register_topic method in RouteInfoManager has been altered to require an immutable reference, promoting safer concurrent access.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
rocketmq-namesrv/src/processor/default_request_processor.rs Updated register_topic_to_name_srv to use decode(body).unwrap_or_default(). Enhanced error handling in get_kv_list_by_namespace and get_topics_by_cluster by replacing .unwrap() with .expect("decode ... failed").
rocketmq-namesrv/src/route/route_info_manager.rs Changed register_topic to use an immutable reference. Updated get_topics_by_cluster parameter type from &str to &CheetahString. Adjusted logging messages for clarity.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Optimize name server DefaultRequestProcessor (#1283)

Possibly related issues

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

enhancement, approved, auto merge, AI review first

Suggested reviewers

  • TeslaRustor
  • SpaceXCN

Poem

In the server's heart, a change so bright,
Request processing now feels just right.
With clearer paths and safer threads,
The data flows where it’s meant to tread.
Hooray for the code, let's give a cheer,
For robust handling, we hold so dear! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@rocketmq-rust-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

🔊@mxsm 🚀Thanks for your contribution 🎉. CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first 🔥

@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot added AI review first Ai review pr first ready to review waiting-review waiting review this PR labels Nov 24, 2024
@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot added this to the v0.4.0 milestone Nov 24, 2024
@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot added the enhancement⚡️ New feature or request label Nov 24, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 24, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 18 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 18.98%. Comparing base (f9b544d) to head (474a002).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
rocketmq-namesrv/src/route/route_info_manager.rs 0.00% 14 Missing ⚠️
...namesrv/src/processor/default_request_processor.rs 0.00% 4 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1284      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   18.98%   18.98%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         428      428              
  Lines       53853    53863      +10     
==========================================
  Hits        10224    10224              
- Misses      43629    43639      +10     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.


🚨 Try these New Features:

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
rocketmq-namesrv/src/processor/default_request_processor.rs (1)

362-362: Consider logging decode failures

While using unwrap_or_default() prevents panics, silently falling back to default values could mask underlying issues. Consider logging decode failures to aid in debugging.

-            let topic_route_data = TopicRouteData::decode(body).unwrap_or_default();
+            let topic_route_data = match TopicRouteData::decode(body) {
+                Ok(data) => data,
+                Err(e) => {
+                    warn!("Failed to decode TopicRouteData: {}", e);
+                    TopicRouteData::default()
+                }
+            };
rocketmq-namesrv/src/route/route_info_manager.rs (2)

Line range hint 765-802: Consider optimizing the topic registration process.

The implementation is correct, but there are opportunities for optimization:

  1. The write lock is held longer than necessary, spanning both the map operations and logging.
  2. The warning message construction happens inside the lock.

Consider this optimization:

 pub(crate) fn register_topic(&self, topic: CheetahString, queue_data_vec: Vec<QueueData>) {
     if queue_data_vec.is_empty() {
         return;
     }
-    let lock = self.lock.write();
-    if !self.topic_queue_table.contains_key(&topic) {
-        self.topic_queue_table
-            .mut_from_ref()
-            .insert(topic.clone(), HashMap::new());
-    }
-    let queue_data_map = self
-        .topic_queue_table
-        .mut_from_ref()
-        .get_mut(&topic)
-        .unwrap();
-    let vec_length = queue_data_vec.len();
+    // Prepare data outside the lock
+    let mut invalid_brokers = Vec::new();
     for queue_data in queue_data_vec {
         if !self
             .broker_addr_table
             .contains_key(queue_data.broker_name())
         {
-            warn!(
-                "Register topic contains illegal broker, {}, {:?}",
-                topic, queue_data
-            );
-            return;
+            invalid_brokers.push(queue_data.clone());
         }
-        queue_data_map.insert(queue_data.broker_name().clone(), queue_data);
     }
+    
+    if !invalid_brokers.is_empty() {
+        warn!(
+            "Register topic contains illegal brokers, {}, {:?}",
+            topic, invalid_brokers
+        );
+        return;
+    }
+    
+    // Minimize lock duration
+    let vec_length;
+    {
+        let lock = self.lock.write();
+        if !self.topic_queue_table.contains_key(&topic) {
+            self.topic_queue_table
+                .mut_from_ref()
+                .insert(topic.clone(), HashMap::new());
+        }
+        let queue_data_map = self
+            .topic_queue_table
+            .mut_from_ref()
+            .get_mut(&topic)
+            .unwrap();
+        vec_length = queue_data_vec.len();
+        for queue_data in queue_data_vec {
+            queue_data_map.insert(queue_data.broker_name().clone(), queue_data);
+        }
+    }
-    drop(lock);

     if queue_data_map.len() > vec_length {
         info!("Topic route already exist.{}, {:?}", topic, queue_data_map)
     } else {
         info!("Register topic route:{}, {:?}", topic, queue_data_map)
     }
 }

Line range hint 803-819: Optimize topic collection efficiency.

The current implementation iterates through all topics for each broker in the cluster. This can be inefficient for large topic sets.

Consider this more efficient approach:

 pub(crate) fn get_topics_by_cluster(&self, cluster: &CheetahString) -> TopicList {
-    let mut topic_list = Vec::new();
+    let mut topic_set = HashSet::new();
     let lock = self.lock.read();
     if let Some(broker_name_set) = self.cluster_addr_table.get(cluster) {
+        // Pre-calculate capacity to avoid reallocations
+        topic_set.reserve(self.topic_queue_table.len());
         for broker_name in broker_name_set {
             for (topic, queue_data_map) in self.topic_queue_table.iter() {
                 if let Some(_queue_data) = queue_data_map.get(broker_name) {
-                    topic_list.push(topic.clone());
+                    topic_set.insert(topic.clone());
                 }
             }
         }
     }
     drop(lock);
     TopicList {
-        topic_list,
+        topic_list: topic_set.into_iter().collect(),
         broker_addr: None,
     }
 }

This optimization:

  1. Uses a HashSet to automatically deduplicate topics
  2. Pre-allocates capacity to avoid reallocations
  3. Converts to Vec only at the end
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f9b544d and 474a002.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • rocketmq-namesrv/src/processor/default_request_processor.rs (3 hunks)
  • rocketmq-namesrv/src/route/route_info_manager.rs (4 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
rocketmq-namesrv/src/processor/default_request_processor.rs (2)

374-374: LGTM!

The error message improvement in expect() provides better context for debugging.


399-402: LGTM!

The change to use CheetahString improves type safety and maintains consistency with the RouteInfoManager interface.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
AI review first Ai review pr first approved PR has approved auto merge enhancement⚡️ New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Enhancement⚡️] Optimize name server DefaultRequestProcessor
3 participants