Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ISSUE #1310]⚡️Refactor AllocateMessageQueueStrategy #1311

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 25, 2024

Conversation

mxsm
Copy link
Owner

@mxsm mxsm commented Nov 25, 2024

Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)

Fixes #1310

Brief Description

How Did You Test This Change?

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced type safety in the message queue allocation methods by updating parameter types for consumer_group and current_cid.
  • Bug Fixes

    • No specific bug fixes were introduced in this release.
  • Documentation

    • Updated method signatures for clarity and consistency in the allocation strategies.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 25, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve modifications to the AllocateMessageQueueStrategy trait and its implementation in the rocketmq-client. Specifically, the parameter types for the allocate method have been updated from &str to &CheetahString for both consumer_group and current_cid. This affects the method signatures in both the trait and the AllocateMessageQueueAveragely struct while maintaining the overall functionality and return types of the methods.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
rocketmq-client/src/consumer/allocate_message_queue_strategy.rs Updated allocate method signature: &str to &CheetahString for consumer_group and current_cid.
rocketmq-client/src/consumer/rebalance_strategy/allocate_message_queue_averagely.rs Updated allocate method signature: &str to &CheetahString for consumer_group and current_cid.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Refactor AllocateMessageQueueStrategy (#1310)

Possibly related issues

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

enhancement, approved, auto merge, AI review first

Suggested reviewers

  • TeslaRustor
  • SpaceXCN

Poem

In the fields where queues align,
CheetahStrings now brightly shine.
With every hop and every bound,
A better way to share is found.
So let us cheer, both near and far,
For the changes made, our shining star! 🌟


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot added this to the v0.4.0 milestone Nov 25, 2024
@rocketmq-rust-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

🔊@mxsm 🚀Thanks for your contribution 🎉. CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first 🔥

@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot added AI review first Ai review pr first ready to review waiting-review waiting review this PR enhancement⚡️ New feature or request labels Nov 25, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
rocketmq-client/src/consumer/allocate_message_queue_strategy.rs (1)

25-26: Consider documenting the rationale for using CheetahString

The change from &str to &CheetahString suggests an optimization or specific requirement. Consider adding documentation to explain:

  1. Why CheetahString is preferred over &str
  2. Any performance implications
  3. Migration guidelines for implementors

Add documentation above the trait:

+ /// A strategy trait for allocating message queues to consumers.
+ /// Uses `CheetahString` for optimized string handling in high-performance scenarios.
+ /// 
+ /// # Breaking Changes
+ /// As of version X.Y.Z, consumer_group and current_cid parameters now use `CheetahString`
+ /// instead of `&str` for improved performance and consistency.
pub trait AllocateMessageQueueStrategy: Send + Sync {
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6e8aaac and d631031.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • rocketmq-client/src/consumer/allocate_message_queue_strategy.rs (1 hunks)
  • rocketmq-client/src/consumer/rebalance_strategy/allocate_message_queue_averagely.rs (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
rocketmq-client/src/consumer/allocate_message_queue_strategy.rs (2)

25-28: Verify consistent parameter type usage

The method uses a mix of CheetahString and MessageQueue types. Let's ensure this is intentional and consistent with the codebase patterns.

✅ Verification successful

Let me gather more information about the usage patterns of these types in the codebase.


Based on the results, I can now provide a final response as we have sufficient information about the type usage patterns.

Parameter types are consistent with the trait definition

The parameter types are correctly defined and consistent with the codebase patterns. The types are part of the AllocateMessageQueueStrategy trait definition, and the implementation in AllocateMessageQueueAveragely follows the same pattern. This is a deliberate design choice for message queue allocation strategies in the RocketMQ client.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check consistency of parameter types across similar interfaces

# Find other methods using MessageQueue with CheetahString
echo "Checking parameter type patterns..."
rg -A 3 'fn \w+.*CheetahString.*MessageQueue'

# Find other methods with similar parameter combinations
echo "Checking similar interfaces..."
ast-grep --pattern 'fn $_($_, $_: &CheetahString, $_: &[MessageQueue], $_)'

Length of output: 1710


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the implementation context and other similar allocation strategies

# Find the trait or interface definition for this allocation strategy
echo "Checking trait definition..."
rg -A 10 "trait AllocateMessageQueueStrategy"

# Find other implementations of allocation strategies
echo "Checking other implementations..."
ast-grep --pattern 'impl AllocateMessageQueueStrategy for $_'

# Check for other methods with similar parameter lists
echo "Checking similar parameter patterns..."
rg -A 3 'fn allocate.*&\[MessageQueue\].*&\[CheetahString\]'

Length of output: 7203


25-26: Verify the impact of switching from &str to &CheetahString

This change modifies the trait's public interface, which is a breaking change. All implementations of AllocateMessageQueueStrategy will need to be updated.

Let's verify the impact and consistency of this change:

✅ Verification successful

Let me gather more information about the implementations to ensure we have a complete picture.


Let me search for more information about CheetahString and its relationship with the codebase.


Let me search for more specific information about the trait implementations and their usage.


Based on the search results, I can now provide a final response about the impact of changing from &str to &CheetahString.

Breaking change is properly handled and consistent across the codebase

The change from &str to &CheetahString in the AllocateMessageQueueStrategy trait is properly implemented:

  1. The trait definition and its only implementation (AllocateMessageQueueAveragely) consistently use &CheetahString
  2. The only usage found is in rebalance_impl.rs which already uses the correct type through as_ref()
  3. No test implementations were found that would need updating
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for implementations and usages that might need updates

# Find all implementations of AllocateMessageQueueStrategy
echo "Checking implementations of AllocateMessageQueueStrategy..."
ast-grep --pattern 'impl $_ for $_ {
  $$$
  fn allocate(&self, consumer_group: $_, current_cid: $_, $_) {
    $$$
  }
  $$$
}'

# Find all direct usages of the allocate method
echo "Checking direct usages of allocate method..."
rg -A 2 '\.allocate\s*\(' 

Length of output: 814


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Find all implementations of AllocateMessageQueueStrategy trait
echo "Searching for AllocateMessageQueueStrategy implementations..."
rg -B 2 -A 5 "impl.*AllocateMessageQueueStrategy"

# Find CheetahString type definition and usage
echo "Searching for CheetahString type..."
rg "type CheetahString" -A 2

# Check if there are any other implementations in test modules
echo "Checking test implementations..."
rg -B 2 -A 5 "#\[cfg\(test\)\].*impl.*AllocateMessageQueueStrategy"

Length of output: 1368


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Find the definition and usage of CheetahString in the codebase
echo "Searching for CheetahString definition..."
rg "CheetahString" -B 2 -A 2

# Look for any test files that might use AllocateMessageQueueStrategy
echo "Searching for test files using AllocateMessageQueueStrategy..."
rg "AllocateMessageQueueStrategy" --type rust -g "*test*.rs" -B 2 -A 2

# Check if there are any other strategy implementations
echo "Searching for other strategy implementations..."
fd -e rs | xargs rg "AllocateMessageQueueStrategy" -l

Length of output: 103047


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for all files containing AllocateMessageQueueStrategy trait definition and implementations
echo "Searching for AllocateMessageQueueStrategy trait and implementations..."
rg -p "trait AllocateMessageQueueStrategy|impl.*AllocateMessageQueueStrategy" -B 3 -A 10

# Search for direct usages of CheetahString in the consumer module
echo "Searching for CheetahString usages in consumer module..."
rg "CheetahString" --type rust -g "consumer/*.rs" -B 2 -A 2

# Look for any test modules using AllocateMessageQueueStrategy
echo "Searching for test modules..."
rg "#\[cfg\(test\)\]" -A 10 -g "*allocate*.rs"

Length of output: 1720

rocketmq-client/src/consumer/rebalance_strategy/allocate_message_queue_averagely.rs (2)

Line range hint 33-65: Excellent implementation with robust overflow protection! 👍

The implementation handles edge cases well, particularly:

  • Protection against subtraction overflow
  • Handling scenarios with more consumers than queues
  • Managing uneven queue distribution

29-30: Verify CheetahString comparison behavior.

The change from &str to &CheetahString for parameters looks good and aligns with the refactoring goal. However, since these parameters are used in equality comparisons (e.g., with cid_all), we should verify that CheetahString implements the required comparison traits correctly.

✅ Verification successful

Let me gather more information about CheetahString's implementation and usage.


Let me search for more specific information about the trait implementations and the check function used in the allocation strategy.


Let me check one final aspect about the CheetahString type and its usage in the codebase.


CheetahString parameter change is safe to proceed

The change from &str to &CheetahString is safe because:

  1. AllocateMessageQueueAveragely is the only implementation of AllocateMessageQueueStrategy in the codebase
  2. The trait definition itself already uses CheetahString in its signature, so this change actually aligns the implementation with the trait definition
  3. The comparison operation in the implementation (line 41: cid == current_cid) is between two CheetahString references, ensuring type consistency
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify CheetahString implements required traits and check for other implementations
# that might be affected by this change

# Check if CheetahString implements PartialEq
ast-grep --pattern 'impl $_ PartialEq for CheetahString'

# Look for other implementations of AllocateMessageQueueStrategy
ast-grep --pattern 'impl AllocateMessageQueueStrategy for $_'

Length of output: 5906


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for CheetahString definition and trait implementations
rg -A 5 "struct CheetahString" 

# Search for the check function used in allocate
ast-grep --pattern 'fn check($$$)'

# Search for other uses of CheetahString in comparisons
rg "CheetahString.*==|==.*CheetahString"

Length of output: 1157


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for the check function in the rebalance strategy module
rg -A 5 "fn check.*consumer_group.*current_cid.*mq_all.*cid_all"

# Look for CheetahString trait implementations in the codebase
rg -A 2 "impl.*for CheetahString"

# Search for the trait definition to understand required methods
rg -A 5 "trait AllocateMessageQueueStrategy"

Length of output: 729


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for the CheetahString module/type definition and its derives
rg -B 2 -A 5 "pub.*struct CheetahString"

# Look for the check function implementation in the rebalance module
rg -B 2 -A 10 "fn check.*Result" rocketmq-client/src/consumer/rebalance_strategy/

# Search for other implementations of AllocateMessageQueueStrategy to verify impact
fd -e rs | xargs rg "impl AllocateMessageQueueStrategy"

Length of output: 338

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 25, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 19.28%. Comparing base (6e8aaac) to head (d631031).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...lance_strategy/allocate_message_queue_averagely.rs 0.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1311      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   19.29%   19.28%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         433      433              
  Lines       54114    54114              
==========================================
- Hits        10439    10438       -1     
- Misses      43675    43676       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.


🚨 Try these New Features:

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
AI review first Ai review pr first approved PR has approved auto merge enhancement⚡️ New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Enhancement⚡️] Refactor AllocateMessageQueueStrategy
3 participants