[ISSUE #1367]🚀Client Supports request code SetMessageRequestMode (401) #1395
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces multiple changes across various files in the RocketMQ client and tools. Key modifications include altering the visibility of several structs and modules from Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
|
🔊@mxsm 🚀Thanks for your contribution 🎉. CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first 🔥 |
rocketmq-rust-bot
added
AI review first
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1395 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 21.67% 21.29% -0.39%
==========================================
Files 440 442 +2
Lines 55661 56660 +999
==========================================
Hits 12065 12065
- Misses 43596 44595 +999 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
rocketmq-rust-bot
added
approved
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (16)
rocketmq-tools/src/lib.rs (1)
19-20: Consider adding module-level documentation.Since these modules are now part of the public API, they should be properly documented to help users understand their purpose and usage.
Add module documentation like this:
+/// Admin module provides administrative functionality for RocketMQ operations. pub mod admin; +/// Error types specific to RocketMQ tools operations. pub mod tools_error;rocketmq-tools/src/admin.rs (1)
18-19: LGTM! New modules for enhanced admin functionality.The addition of
default_mq_admin_extanddefault_mq_admin_ext_implmodules aligns with the PR objective of implementing SetMessageRequestMode support and follows Rust's module organization practices.Consider adding module-level documentation (//! comments) to describe the purpose and relationship between these modules, especially how they relate to SetMessageRequestMode functionality.
rocketmq-client/src/consumer/consumer_impl/pull_request_ext.rs (1)
19-23: Add documentation for the struct and its fields.Consider adding rustdoc comments to document the purpose of the struct and its fields, especially since this is now a public API.
+/// Extends the pull result with additional metadata for message processing pub struct PullResultExt { + /// The original pull result pub pull_result: PullResult, + /// ID of the suggested broker for subsequent operations pub suggest_which_broker_id: u64, + /// Optional binary payload of the message pub message_binary: Option<bytes::Bytes>, + /// Optional difference in offset pub offset_delta: Option<i64>, }rocketmq-client/src/lib.rs (1)
30-30: Document the public API change.Since this change exposes a previously internal module, please ensure:
- The module and its public items are properly documented
- The change is noted in the changelog
- If this is a stable release, consider the impact on semantic versioning
rocketmq-tools/src/tools_error.rs (1)
21-22: LGTM! Good improvements to error handling.The enhancement of
MQClientErrorvariant with proper error propagation and detailed error messages is a good improvement. This change:
- Provides better error context by including the underlying client error
- Follows Rust error handling best practices with
#[from]attribute- Supports the new SetMessageRequestMode functionality with proper error propagation
Consider adding a
Displayimplementation for better error formatting in logs:impl std::fmt::Display for ToolsError { fn fmt(&self, f: &mut std::fmt::Formatter<'_>) -> std::fmt::Result { write!(f, "RocketMQ tools error: {}", std::error::Error::to_string(self)) } }rocketmq-client/src/producer/producer_impl/mq_producer_inner.rs (2)
Line range hint
71-75: Replace unreachable! with proper error handlingThe
get_check_listenermethod assumesdefault_mqproducer_impl_inneris neverNone, but the field isOption<T>. This could lead to runtime panics.Consider this safer approach:
- pub fn get_check_listener(&self) -> Arc<Box<dyn TransactionListener>> { + pub fn get_check_listener(&self) -> Option<Arc<Box<dyn TransactionListener>>> { if let Some(default_mqproducer_impl_inner) = &self.default_mqproducer_impl_inner { - return default_mqproducer_impl_inner.get_check_listener(); + Some(default_mqproducer_impl_inner.get_check_listener()) + } else { + None } - unreachable!("default_mqproducer_impl_inner is None") }
Line range hint
54-106: Implement consistent error handling across methodsThe methods handle the
Nonecase ofdefault_mqproducer_impl_innerinconsistently:
- Some return default values (empty HashSet, false)
- Some silently do nothing
- One panics with unreachable!
Consider implementing consistent error handling:
- Return
ResultorOptionfrom all methods to make error cases explicit- Document the behavior when
default_mqproducer_impl_innerisNone- Add builder pattern to ensure
default_mqproducer_impl_inneris properly initializedExample refactor:
impl MQProducerInnerImpl { pub fn get_publish_topic_list(&self) -> Option<HashSet<CheetahString>> { self.default_mqproducer_impl_inner .as_ref() .map(|impl_inner| impl_inner.get_publish_topic_list()) } // Apply similar pattern to other methods }rocketmq-client/src/consumer/mq_consumer_inner.rs (2)
Line range hint
126-136: Replace panic conditions with proper error handlingThe current implementation panics in all methods when
default_mqpush_consumer_implis None. This could lead to runtime crashes and provides no recovery path. Consider returningResultinstead.Here's an example refactor for the first two methods:
- pub(crate) async fn pop_message(&mut self, pop_request: PopRequest) { + pub(crate) async fn pop_message(&mut self, pop_request: PopRequest) -> Result<()> { if let Some(ref default_mqpush_consumer_impl) = self.default_mqpush_consumer_impl { if let Some(mut default_mqpush_consumer_impl) = default_mqpush_consumer_impl.upgrade() { - default_mqpush_consumer_impl.pop_message(pop_request).await; + return default_mqpush_consumer_impl.pop_message(pop_request).await; } } + Err(RocketMQError::ConsumerError("default_mqpush_consumer_impl is None".into())) } - pub(crate) async fn pull_message(&mut self, pull_request: PullRequest) { + pub(crate) async fn pull_message(&mut self, pull_request: PullRequest) -> Result<()> { if let Some(ref default_mqpush_consumer_impl) = self.default_mqpush_consumer_impl { if let Some(mut default_mqpush_consumer_impl) = default_mqpush_consumer_impl.upgrade() { - default_mqpush_consumer_impl + return default_mqpush_consumer_impl .pull_message(pull_request) .await; } } + Err(RocketMQError::ConsumerError("default_mqpush_consumer_impl is None".into())) }Similar changes should be applied to all other methods that currently panic.
Also applies to: 137-145
108-111: Add comprehensive documentation for MQConsumerInnerImplThe struct lacks critical documentation about:
- Lifecycle and ownership model
- Valid states and when
Noneis acceptable fordefault_mqpush_consumer_impl- Memory management requirements for
WeakArcMutAdd documentation like this:
+/// Implements the inner consumer functionality with weak references to avoid memory leaks. +/// +/// # Lifecycle +/// Describe the lifecycle of this struct and when default_mqpush_consumer_impl can be None +/// +/// # Memory Management +/// Explain the WeakArcMut usage and ownership model +/// +/// # Examples +/// ``` +/// // Add usage examples +/// ``` pub struct MQConsumerInnerImpl { pub(crate) default_mqpush_consumer_impl: Option<WeakArcMut<DefaultMQPushConsumerImpl>>, }rocketmq-client/src/implementation/mq_client_api_impl.rs (2)
1212-1247: Add documentation and tests for the new method.The implementation looks good, but it needs documentation comments explaining the purpose, parameters, and return value. Additionally, test coverage is missing for this new functionality.
Would you like me to help with:
- Generating documentation comments for the method?
- Creating unit tests to cover the new functionality?
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 1212-1247: rocketmq-client/src/implementation/mq_client_api_impl.rs#L1212-L1247
Added lines #L1212 - L1247 were not covered by tests
1217-1218: Add input validation for pop_share_queue_num.Consider adding validation for
pop_share_queue_numto ensure it's within acceptable bounds.pub async fn set_message_request_mode( &mut self, broker_addr: &CheetahString, topic: &CheetahString, consumer_group: &CheetahString, mode: MessageRequestMode, pop_share_queue_num: i32, timeout_millis: u64, ) -> Result<()> { + if pop_share_queue_num < 0 { + return Err(MQClientErr( + -1, + "pop_share_queue_num must be non-negative".to_string(), + )); + } let body = SetMessageRequestModeRequestBody {rocketmq-tools/src/admin/default_mq_admin_ext.rs (2)
56-57: Review unnecessary#[allow]attributes.The attributes
#[allow(unused_variables)]and#[allow(unused_mut)]may be unnecessary if variables will be used in future implementations. Consider removing them to let the compiler warn about any truly unused variables, which can help catch potential issues.
59-688: Consider implementing or stubbing the methods.All methods in the
MQAdminExtimplementation currently containtodo!()placeholders. Implementing these methods or providing meaningful stubs will enhance code functionality and facilitate testing.Would you like assistance in outlining or implementing any of these methods? I can help by providing initial implementations or setting up scaffolding for future development.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 60-61: rocketmq-tools/src/admin/default_mq_admin_ext.rs#L60-L61
Added lines #L60 - L61 were not covered by tests
[warning] 64-65: rocketmq-tools/src/admin/default_mq_admin_ext.rs#L64-L65
Added lines #L64 - L65 were not covered by tests
[warning] 68-73: rocketmq-tools/src/admin/default_mq_admin_ext.rs#L68-L73
Added lines #L68 - L73 were not covered by tests
[warning] 76-83: rocketmq-tools/src/admin/default_mq_admin_ext.rs#L76-L83
Added lines #L76 - L83 were not covered by tests
[warning] 86-91: rocketmq-tools/src/admin/default_mq_admin_ext.rs#L86-L91
Added lines #L86 - L91 were not covered by tests
[warning] 94-98: rocketmq-tools/src/admin/default_mq_admin_ext.rs#L94-L98
Added lines #L94 - L98 were not covered by tests
[warning] 101-106: rocketmq-tools/src/admin/default_mq_admin_ext.rs#L101-L106
Added lines #L101 - L106 were not covered by tests
[warning] 109-114: rocketmq-tools/src/admin/default_mq_admin_ext.rs#L109-L114
Added lines #L109 - L114 were not covered by tests
[warning] 117-122: rocketmq-tools/src/admin/default_mq_admin_ext.rs#L117-L122
Added lines #L117 - L122 were not covered by tests
[warning] 125-130: rocketmq-tools/src/admin/default_mq_admin_ext.rs#L125-L130
Added lines #L125 - L130 were not covered by tests
[warning] 133-139: rocketmq-tools/src/admin/default_mq_admin_ext.rs#L133-L139
Added lines #L133 - L139 were not covered by tests
[warning] 142-146: rocketmq-tools/src/admin/default_mq_admin_ext.rs#L142-L146
Added lines #L142 - L146 were not covered by tests
[warning] 149-154: rocketmq-tools/src/admin/default_mq_admin_ext.rs#L149-L154
Added lines #L149 - L154 were not covered by tests
[warning] 157-162: rocketmq-tools/src/admin/default_mq_admin_ext.rs#L157-L162
Added lines #L157 - L162 were not covered by tests
[warning] 165-170: rocketmq-tools/src/admin/default_mq_admin_ext.rs#L165-L170
Added lines #L165 - L170 were not covered by tests
[warning] 173-178: rocketmq-tools/src/admin/default_mq_admin_ext.rs#L173-L178
Added lines #L173 - L178 were not covered by tests
[warning] 181-185: rocketmq-tools/src/admin/default_mq_admin_ext.rs#L181-L185
Added lines #L181 - L185 were not covered by tests
[warning] 188-189: rocketmq-tools/src/admin/default_mq_admin_ext.rs#L188-L189
Added lines #L188 - L189 were not covered by tests
[warning] 192-196: rocketmq-tools/src/admin/default_mq_admin_ext.rs#L192-L196
Added lines #L192 - L196 were not covered by tests
[warning] 199-203: rocketmq-tools/src/admin/default_mq_admin_ext.rs#L199-L203
Added lines #L199 - L203 were not covered by tests
[warning] 206-214: rocketmq-tools/src/admin/default_mq_admin_ext.rs#L206-L214
Added lines #L206 - L214 were not covered by tests
[warning] 217-218: rocketmq-tools/src/admin/default_mq_admin_ext.rs#L217-L218
Added lines #L217 - L218 were not covered by tests
[warning] 221-225: rocketmq-tools/src/admin/default_mq_admin_ext.rs#L221-L225
Added lines #L221 - L225 were not covered by tests
[warning] 228-233: rocketmq-tools/src/admin/default_mq_admin_ext.rs#L228-L233
Added lines #L228 - L233 were not covered by tests
[warning] 236-241: rocketmq-tools/src/admin/default_mq_admin_ext.rs#L236-L241
Added lines #L236 - L241 were not covered by tests
[warning] 244-245: rocketmq-tools/src/admin/default_mq_admin_ext.rs#L244-L245
Added lines #L244 - L245 were not covered by tests
[warning] 248-253: rocketmq-tools/src/admin/default_mq_admin_ext.rs#L248-L253
Added lines #L248 - L253 were not covered by tests
[warning] 256-261: rocketmq-tools/src/admin/default_mq_admin_ext.rs#L256-L261
Added lines #L256 - L261 were not covered by tests
[warning] 264-270: rocketmq-tools/src/admin/default_mq_admin_ext.rs#L264-L270
Added lines #L264 - L270 were not covered by testsrocketmq-tools/src/admin/default_mq_admin_ext_impl.rs (3)
557-557: Remove unnecessarymutin variable declarationThe variable
mq_client_apideclared on line 557 does not need to be mutable, as it is not modified after initialization. Declaring it as immutable enhances code clarity.Apply this diff to remove the unnecessary
mut:-let mut mq_client_api = ... +let mq_client_api = ...
79-79: Simplify therpc_hookfield typeThe
rpc_hookfield is defined asOption<Arc<Box<dyn RPCHook>>>, which introduces unnecessary nesting of smart pointers (Arc<Box<...>>). You can simplify it toOption<Arc<dyn RPCHook>>, reducing complexity and improving readability.Apply this diff to simplify the field's type:
- rpc_hook: Option<Arc<Box<dyn RPCHook>>>, + rpc_hook: Option<Arc<dyn RPCHook>>,Ensure that any code using
rpc_hookis updated accordingly.
53-72: Simplify the initialization ofSYSTEM_GROUP_SETThe initialization of
SYSTEM_GROUP_SETcan be simplified using an array and thecollectmethod, improving readability and conciseness.Apply this diff to simplify the code:
lazy_static! { static ref SYSTEM_GROUP_SET: HashSet<CheetahString> = { - let mut set = HashSet::new(); - set.insert(CheetahString::from(mix_all::DEFAULT_CONSUMER_GROUP)); - set.insert(CheetahString::from(mix_all::DEFAULT_PRODUCER_GROUP)); - set.insert(CheetahString::from(mix_all::TOOLS_CONSUMER_GROUP)); - set.insert(CheetahString::from(mix_all::SCHEDULE_CONSUMER_GROUP)); - set.insert(CheetahString::from(mix_all::FILTERSRV_CONSUMER_GROUP)); - set.insert(CheetahString::from(mix_all::MONITOR_CONSUMER_GROUP)); - set.insert(CheetahString::from(mix_all::CLIENT_INNER_PRODUCER_GROUP)); - set.insert(CheetahString::from(mix_all::SELF_TEST_PRODUCER_GROUP)); - set.insert(CheetahString::from(mix_all::SELF_TEST_CONSUMER_GROUP)); - set.insert(CheetahString::from(mix_all::ONS_HTTP_PROXY_GROUP)); - set.insert(CheetahString::from(mix_all::CID_ONSAPI_PERMISSION_GROUP)); - set.insert(CheetahString::from(mix_all::CID_ONSAPI_OWNER_GROUP)); - set.insert(CheetahString::from(mix_all::CID_ONSAPI_PULL_GROUP)); - set.insert(CheetahString::from(mix_all::CID_SYS_RMQ_TRANS)); - set + [ + mix_all::DEFAULT_CONSUMER_GROUP, + mix_all::DEFAULT_PRODUCER_GROUP, + mix_all::TOOLS_CONSUMER_GROUP, + mix_all::SCHEDULE_CONSUMER_GROUP, + mix_all::FILTERSRV_CONSUMER_GROUP, + mix_all::MONITOR_CONSUMER_GROUP, + mix_all::CLIENT_INNER_PRODUCER_GROUP, + mix_all::SELF_TEST_PRODUCER_GROUP, + mix_all::SELF_TEST_CONSUMER_GROUP, + mix_all::ONS_HTTP_PROXY_GROUP, + mix_all::CID_ONSAPI_PERMISSION_GROUP, + mix_all::CID_ONSAPI_OWNER_GROUP, + mix_all::CID_ONSAPI_PULL_GROUP, + mix_all::CID_SYS_RMQ_TRANS, + ] + .iter() + .map(|s| CheetahString::from(*s)) + .collect() }; }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
Cargo.lockis excluded by!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (11)
rocketmq-client/src/consumer/consumer_impl/pull_request_ext.rs(1 hunks)rocketmq-client/src/consumer/mq_consumer_inner.rs(1 hunks)rocketmq-client/src/implementation/mq_client_api_impl.rs(4 hunks)rocketmq-client/src/lib.rs(1 hunks)rocketmq-client/src/producer/producer_impl/mq_producer_inner.rs(1 hunks)rocketmq-tools/Cargo.toml(1 hunks)rocketmq-tools/src/admin.rs(1 hunks)rocketmq-tools/src/admin/default_mq_admin_ext.rs(1 hunks)rocketmq-tools/src/admin/default_mq_admin_ext_impl.rs(1 hunks)rocketmq-tools/src/lib.rs(1 hunks)rocketmq-tools/src/tools_error.rs(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
rocketmq-client/src/implementation/mq_client_api_impl.rs
[warning] 1212-1247: rocketmq-client/src/implementation/mq_client_api_impl.rs#L1212-L1247
Added lines #L1212 - L1247 were not covered by tests
rocketmq-tools/src/admin/default_mq_admin_ext.rs
[warning] 60-61: rocketmq-tools/src/admin/default_mq_admin_ext.rs#L60-L61
Added lines #L60 - L61 were not covered by tests
[warning] 64-65: rocketmq-tools/src/admin/default_mq_admin_ext.rs#L64-L65
Added lines #L64 - L65 were not covered by tests
[warning] 68-73: rocketmq-tools/src/admin/default_mq_admin_ext.rs#L68-L73
Added lines #L68 - L73 were not covered by tests
[warning] 76-83: rocketmq-tools/src/admin/default_mq_admin_ext.rs#L76-L83
Added lines #L76 - L83 were not covered by tests
[warning] 86-91: rocketmq-tools/src/admin/default_mq_admin_ext.rs#L86-L91
Added lines #L86 - L91 were not covered by tests
[warning] 94-98: rocketmq-tools/src/admin/default_mq_admin_ext.rs#L94-L98
Added lines #L94 - L98 were not covered by tests
[warning] 101-106: rocketmq-tools/src/admin/default_mq_admin_ext.rs#L101-L106
Added lines #L101 - L106 were not covered by tests
[warning] 109-114: rocketmq-tools/src/admin/default_mq_admin_ext.rs#L109-L114
Added lines #L109 - L114 were not covered by tests
[warning] 117-122: rocketmq-tools/src/admin/default_mq_admin_ext.rs#L117-L122
Added lines #L117 - L122 were not covered by tests
[warning] 125-130: rocketmq-tools/src/admin/default_mq_admin_ext.rs#L125-L130
Added lines #L125 - L130 were not covered by tests
[warning] 133-139: rocketmq-tools/src/admin/default_mq_admin_ext.rs#L133-L139
Added lines #L133 - L139 were not covered by tests
[warning] 142-146: rocketmq-tools/src/admin/default_mq_admin_ext.rs#L142-L146
Added lines #L142 - L146 were not covered by tests
[warning] 149-154: rocketmq-tools/src/admin/default_mq_admin_ext.rs#L149-L154
Added lines #L149 - L154 were not covered by tests
[warning] 157-162: rocketmq-tools/src/admin/default_mq_admin_ext.rs#L157-L162
Added lines #L157 - L162 were not covered by tests
[warning] 165-170: rocketmq-tools/src/admin/default_mq_admin_ext.rs#L165-L170
Added lines #L165 - L170 were not covered by tests
[warning] 173-178: rocketmq-tools/src/admin/default_mq_admin_ext.rs#L173-L178
Added lines #L173 - L178 were not covered by tests
[warning] 181-185: rocketmq-tools/src/admin/default_mq_admin_ext.rs#L181-L185
Added lines #L181 - L185 were not covered by tests
[warning] 188-189: rocketmq-tools/src/admin/default_mq_admin_ext.rs#L188-L189
Added lines #L188 - L189 were not covered by tests
[warning] 192-196: rocketmq-tools/src/admin/default_mq_admin_ext.rs#L192-L196
Added lines #L192 - L196 were not covered by tests
[warning] 199-203: rocketmq-tools/src/admin/default_mq_admin_ext.rs#L199-L203
Added lines #L199 - L203 were not covered by tests
[warning] 206-214: rocketmq-tools/src/admin/default_mq_admin_ext.rs#L206-L214
Added lines #L206 - L214 were not covered by tests
[warning] 217-218: rocketmq-tools/src/admin/default_mq_admin_ext.rs#L217-L218
Added lines #L217 - L218 were not covered by tests
[warning] 221-225: rocketmq-tools/src/admin/default_mq_admin_ext.rs#L221-L225
Added lines #L221 - L225 were not covered by tests
[warning] 228-233: rocketmq-tools/src/admin/default_mq_admin_ext.rs#L228-L233
Added lines #L228 - L233 were not covered by tests
[warning] 236-241: rocketmq-tools/src/admin/default_mq_admin_ext.rs#L236-L241
Added lines #L236 - L241 were not covered by tests
[warning] 244-245: rocketmq-tools/src/admin/default_mq_admin_ext.rs#L244-L245
Added lines #L244 - L245 were not covered by tests
[warning] 248-253: rocketmq-tools/src/admin/default_mq_admin_ext.rs#L248-L253
Added lines #L248 - L253 were not covered by tests
[warning] 256-261: rocketmq-tools/src/admin/default_mq_admin_ext.rs#L256-L261
Added lines #L256 - L261 were not covered by tests
[warning] 264-270: rocketmq-tools/src/admin/default_mq_admin_ext.rs#L264-L270
Added lines #L264 - L270 were not covered by tests
🔇 Additional comments (10)
rocketmq-tools/Cargo.toml (3)
24-24: LGTM! Improved dependency declaration format
The updated format for trait-variant follows a more consistent style using the table format.
18-18: Verify rocketmq-client-rust version compatibility
The addition of rocketmq-client-rust aligns with the PR objective to implement SetMessageRequestMode support.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the workspace dependencies.
✓ Dependency version is properly configured in workspace
The rocketmq-client-rust dependency is correctly defined in the workspace with version 0.4.0 and properly referenced using workspace inheritance in rocketmq-tools/Cargo.toml. The dependency configuration aligns with other workspace members and follows consistent versioning.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify workspace dependency versions are compatible
# Check workspace Cargo.toml for version specifications
cat Cargo.toml | rg -A 5 '^\[workspace\]'
Length of output: 149
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check workspace dependencies section in root Cargo.toml
cat Cargo.toml | rg -A 20 '^\[workspace\.dependencies\]'
# Check if rocketmq-client-rust is defined in workspace
fd -t f "Cargo.toml" | xargs rg "rocketmq-client-rust"
Length of output: 1474
26-26: Verify the necessity of lazy_static
Please ensure that lazy_static is actually needed for the SetMessageRequestMode implementation.
rocketmq-tools/src/lib.rs (1)
19-20: Verify the necessity and impact of exposing these modules.
Making these modules public represents a significant API change. While this aligns with the broader effort to support SetMessageRequestMode, we should ensure this increased visibility is intentional and necessary.
Let's verify the usage of these modules across the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
The previous results show internal usage patterns within the rocketmq-tools crate and related crates. Let's verify if these modules are actually needed as public APIs by checking their dependencies and implementations.
Making these modules public is necessary and correctly aligned with the codebase architecture.
The verification shows that:
- The
adminmodule contains essential public interfaces (MQAdminExttrait) and implementations (DefaultMQAdminExt) that are core to RocketMQ's administration functionality - The
tools_errormodule defines the error types used throughout the tools crate, which is necessary for proper error handling in public APIs - The changes align with the PR's goal of supporting SetMessageRequestMode, as this functionality is implemented in the admin module (see
set_message_request_modemethod)
The public visibility is intentional and required as:
- The admin module provides the core administration API interface
- The error types need to be public for proper error handling in consuming code
- The implementation follows Rust's typical crate architecture patterns
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for current usage patterns of admin and tools_error modules
# to understand the impact of making them public
echo "Checking admin module usage patterns:"
rg --type rust -B 2 -A 2 "use.*admin"
echo "\nChecking tools_error module usage patterns:"
rg --type rust -B 2 -A 2 "use.*tools_error"
# Check if these modules are already being accessed from external crates
echo "\nChecking for potential external usage attempts:"
rg --type rust "rocketmq_tools::(admin|tools_error)"
Length of output: 15600
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for external crate dependencies and usages
echo "Checking Cargo.toml files for rocketmq-tools dependencies:"
rg --type toml "rocketmq-tools.*version"
echo "\nChecking for potential public API usage of these modules:"
# Look for struct/trait implementations in admin module
ast-grep --pattern 'pub struct $_ {
$$$
}' rocketmq-tools/src/admin/*.rs
echo "\nChecking for trait implementations:"
ast-grep --pattern 'pub trait $_ {
$$$
}' rocketmq-tools/src/admin/*.rs
# Check tools_error module structure
echo "\nChecking tools_error module structure:"
fd tools_error.rs$ --exec cat {}
Length of output: 48271
rocketmq-tools/src/admin.rs (1)
17-17: Verify the impact of increased module visibility.
The visibility change from pub(crate) to pub for common, mq_admin_ext, and mq_admin_ext_async modules makes them part of the public API. Ensure this aligns with the project's API stability guarantees.
Also applies to: 20-21
✅ Verification successful
Module visibility change appears to be intentional and well-structured
The visibility changes align with the crate's public-facing nature, as evidenced by:
- The crate is published on crates.io with a clear description as a tools implementation
- The modules are properly re-exported through the public API in lib.rs
- The crate follows a clean hierarchical structure with proper module organization
The visibility changes from pub(crate) to pub are appropriate for a public tools library and follow Rust's module visibility best practices.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if these modules are already being used outside the crate
# or referenced in documentation/examples
# Check for any external usage of these modules
rg -l "use.*rocketmq_tools::(common|mq_admin_ext|mq_admin_ext_async)" --type rust
# Check if modules are documented in README or examples
fd -e md -e rs -p "README|examples" --exec rg -l "rocketmq_tools::(common|mq_admin_ext|mq_admin_ext_async)"
Length of output: 193
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to analyze the module visibility impact
# 1. Check the current structure and visibility of these modules
rg -A 5 "^pub mod (common|mq_admin_ext|mq_admin_ext_async)" --type rust
# 2. Check if there are any integration tests or examples that might use these modules
fd -e rs -p "tests|examples"
# 3. Look for any documentation mentioning these modules
fd -e md . --exec rg -l "(common|mq_admin_ext|mq_admin_ext_async)"
# 4. Check for any potential cross-crate dependencies in Cargo.toml files
fd Cargo.toml --exec rg -l "rocketmq-tools"
Length of output: 1464
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's analyze the actual usage and dependencies of these modules
# 1. Check how these modules are used within the crate
rg -B2 -A2 "use (crate|super)::(common|mq_admin_ext|mq_admin_ext_async)" rocketmq-tools/
# 2. Check the content of Cargo.toml to understand if this is a public-facing crate
cat rocketmq-tools/Cargo.toml
# 3. Look for any references to these modules in integration tests
fd -e rs -p "tests" rocketmq-tools/
# 4. Check if these modules are re-exported in lib.rs
cat rocketmq-tools/src/lib.rs
Length of output: 1881
rocketmq-client/src/consumer/consumer_impl/pull_request_ext.rs (1)
19-23: Visibility changes look appropriate.
The change from pub(crate) to pub visibility aligns with the need to support the SetMessageRequestMode feature. Let's verify that this struct is actually needed by other crates.
rocketmq-client/src/lib.rs (1)
30-30: Verify if the factory module needs to be public.
Making the factory module public expands the API surface and could be a breaking change. Let's verify if this change is necessary for implementing SetMessageRequestMode support.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the analysis of the shell script outputs, I can now generate the final response:
Making the factory module public is necessary for the client implementation.
The factory module contains the critical MQClientInstance type which is a fundamental component used across the client's public APIs:
-
Used in consumer implementations:
LocalFileOffsetStore,RemoteBrokerOffsetStorefor offset managementPullAPIWrapper,PullMessageServicefor message pullingRebalanceService,RebalancePushImplfor consumer rebalancing
-
Used in producer implementations:
DefaultMQProducerImplfor message productionDefaultServiceDetectorandDefaultResolverfor service discovery
Making the factory module public is required as these components are part of the public API contract and need access to the MQClientInstance type for proper functionality.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if the factory module contains SetMessageRequestMode implementation
# and verify if it's referenced from other public modules
# Check for SetMessageRequestMode implementation in factory module
rg -A 5 "SetMessageRequestMode|401" "rocketmq-client/src/factory/"
# Check for factory module usage in public modules
ast-grep --pattern 'use $$$factory$$$'
Length of output: 107
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search to understand the factory module's usage
# Check the content of the factory module
fd "^factory$" --type d --exec ls -R {}
# Check for any references to factory across the codebase
rg -l "factory" --type rust
# Look for imports or uses of factory module
rg "use (crate|super)::factory" --type rust
# Check if factory is used in any public interfaces
ast-grep --pattern 'pub fn $$$factory$$$'
ast-grep --pattern 'pub struct $$$factory$$$'
Length of output: 3163
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the MQClientInstance usage and its relationship with public APIs
# Check the content of mq_client_instance.rs
cat rocketmq-client/src/factory/mq_client_instance.rs
# Check if MQClientInstance is used in any public interfaces in producer/consumer
rg -B 2 -A 2 "MQClientInstance" "rocketmq-client/src/producer/" "rocketmq-client/src/consumer/"
# Check if factory module is used in any public functions or methods
rg -B 2 -A 2 "pub (fn|struct|trait)" "rocketmq-client/src/producer/" "rocketmq-client/src/consumer/" | rg -B 2 -A 2 "factory"
Length of output: 64653
rocketmq-tools/src/tools_error.rs (1)
21-22: Verify error handling at call sites
Let's ensure the enhanced error handling is properly utilized across the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
Let me try another search pattern to verify the error handling implementation.
Based on the search results, I can now generate the final response:
Error handling implementation is properly propagated
The error handling implementation is correct and properly propagated:
- The
ToolsErrorenum correctly wrapsMQClientErrorusing#[from]derive macro, enabling automatic conversion - The client code in
rocketmq-tools/src/admin/default_mq_admin_ext_impl.rsproperly maps client errors toToolsError - The error type is consistently used through the tools crate via the
Result<T, ToolsError>type alias - No instances of unwrapped
MQClientErrorusage were found in the tools crate
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check usage of MQClientError in the codebase
# Find all potential error handling sites
echo "Checking error handling patterns..."
rg -A 2 "MQClientError"
# Check for potential missing error propagation
echo "Checking for potential missing error propagation..."
rg "-> Result<.+, ToolsError>" -A 5 | rg "MQClientError"
# Look for direct usage of client errors that should be wrapped
echo "Checking for unwrapped client errors..."
ast-grep --pattern 'Result<$_, rocketmq_client_rust::error::MQClientError>'
Length of output: 38202
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for Result types with ToolsError in the codebase
rg "Result<.*,\s*ToolsError>" -A 3
# Search for any direct usage of MQClientError without wrapping
rg "MQClientError::" -B 2 -A 2
# Check implementation of functions returning ToolsError
ast-grep --pattern 'fn $_($$$) -> Result<$_, ToolsError> {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 51815
rocketmq-client/src/producer/producer_impl/mq_producer_inner.rs (1)
49-49: Consider the implications of exposing this implementation struct
Making MQProducerInnerImpl public while keeping its field pub(crate) creates mixed visibility that could lead to confusion. Consider one of these approaches:
- Keep the struct
pub(crate)if it's meant to be an internal implementation detail - If public visibility is required:
- Document the public API and its stability guarantees
- Consider making the field private and providing appropriate public methods
- Add rustdoc comments explaining the intended usage
Let's verify if this struct is used outside the crate:
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more context about the usage pattern and visibility requirements.
Let me try a different approach to understand the module structure and usage.
Based on the gathered information, I can now generate the final response:
Making MQProducerInnerImpl public is necessary for the client factory pattern
The visibility change is justified because:
MQProducerInnerImplis used inmq_client_instance.rsfor producer registration and selection- It's part of the client factory pattern where producers need to be managed by the client instance
- The struct is already well-encapsulated with
pub(crate)fields and provides a controlled public API
The change aligns with the codebase's architecture where the client instance needs to manage producer instances through a public interface.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for external usage of MQProducerInnerImpl
rg "MQProducerInnerImpl" --type rust
Length of output: 1028
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the trait implementation and usage
ast-grep --pattern 'impl $_ for MQProducerInnerImpl { $$$ }'
# Check if this is used in any public API
ast-grep --pattern 'pub fn $_($$$) -> $$$MQProducerInnerImpl$$$'
# Check the module structure
rg "mod|pub use" rocketmq-client/src/producer/mod.rs
Length of output: 260
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Find the producer module file
fd "mod.rs|lib.rs" rocketmq-client/src/
# Check how MQProducerInnerImpl is used in the crate's public API
rg "pub (use|mod|struct|fn)" rocketmq-client/src/producer/ --type rust
# Look for trait implementations
rg "impl.*MQProducerInnerImpl" -A 5 --type rust
Length of output: 27749
rocketmq-client/src/consumer/mq_consumer_inner.rs (1)
108-111: Consider the implications of making MQConsumerInnerImpl public
Making this struct public exposes internal implementation details and could make future refactoring more difficult. The use of WeakArcMut suggests complex memory management that external users might not handle correctly.
Consider the following alternatives:
- Keep the struct
pub(crate)and expose only necessary functionality through a public interface - If public access is required, document the memory management requirements and usage patterns
Let's verify if this struct is actually needed outside the crate:
| async fn get_cluster_list(&self, topic: String) -> crate::Result<HashSet<CheetahString>> { | ||
| todo!() | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| async fn get_topic_cluster_list(&self, topic: String) -> crate::Result<HashSet<CheetahString>> { | ||
| todo!() | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Maintain consistent parameter types.
In the methods get_cluster_list and get_topic_cluster_list, the topic parameter is of type String, whereas similar methods use CheetahString. To maintain consistency across the API, consider changing the parameter type to CheetahString.
Suggested changes:
- async fn get_cluster_list(&self, topic: String) -> crate::Result<HashSet<CheetahString>> {
+ async fn get_cluster_list(&self, topic: CheetahString) -> crate::Result<HashSet<CheetahString>> {
- async fn get_topic_cluster_list(&self, topic: String) -> crate::Result<HashSet<CheetahString>> {
+ async fn get_topic_cluster_list(&self, topic: CheetahString) -> crate::Result<HashSet<CheetahString>> {📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| async fn get_cluster_list(&self, topic: String) -> crate::Result<HashSet<CheetahString>> { | |
| todo!() | |
| } | |
| async fn get_topic_cluster_list(&self, topic: String) -> crate::Result<HashSet<CheetahString>> { | |
| todo!() | |
| } | |
| async fn get_cluster_list(&self, topic: CheetahString) -> crate::Result<HashSet<CheetahString>> { | |
| todo!() | |
| } | |
| async fn get_topic_cluster_list(&self, topic: CheetahString) -> crate::Result<HashSet<CheetahString>> { | |
| todo!() | |
| } |
| async fn put_kv_config( | ||
| &self, | ||
| namespace: CheetahString, | ||
| key: CheetahString, | ||
| value: CheetahString, | ||
| ) { | ||
| todo!() | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Ensure consistent return types for methods.
The method put_kv_config does not return a crate::Result<()>, unlike other methods which return a result type for error handling. For consistency and proper error handling, consider changing the method signature to return crate::Result<()>.
Suggested change:
async fn put_kv_config(
&self,
namespace: CheetahString,
key: CheetahString,
value: CheetahString,
- ) {
+ ) -> crate::Result<()> {
todo!()
+ Ok(())
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| async fn put_kv_config( | |
| &self, | |
| namespace: CheetahString, | |
| key: CheetahString, | |
| value: CheetahString, | |
| ) { | |
| todo!() | |
| } | |
| async fn put_kv_config( | |
| &self, | |
| namespace: CheetahString, | |
| key: CheetahString, | |
| value: CheetahString, | |
| ) -> crate::Result<()> { | |
| todo!() | |
| Ok(()) | |
| } |
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 264-270: rocketmq-tools/src/admin/default_mq_admin_ext.rs#L264-L270
Added lines #L264 - L270 were not covered by tests
| let mut mq_client_api = self | ||
| .client_instance | ||
| .as_ref() | ||
| .unwrap() | ||
| .get_mq_client_api_impl(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Handle potential None value when accessing client_instance
In lines 557-561, the code calls unwrap() on self.client_instance, which may panic if client_instance is None. To prevent potential runtime errors, it's advisable to handle the None case explicitly.
Consider modifying the code to handle the None case:
let mq_client_api = match self.client_instance.as_ref() {
Some(client_instance) => client_instance.get_mq_client_api_impl(),
None => {
+ return Err(crate::tools_error::ToolsError::ClientInstanceUnavailable);
}
};Ensure that you define the ClientInstanceUnavailable variant in ToolsError to handle this error case.
Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)
Fixes #1367
Brief Description
How Did You Test This Change?
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
DefaultMQAdminExtandDefaultMQAdminExtImplfor asynchronous management of RocketMQ brokers.Enhancements
MQClientErrorto provide more context.Documentation
rocketmq-toolsto enhance accessibility.