Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ISSUE #1429]🔥Add LitePullConsumer trait for client🚧 #1432

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 29, 2024

Conversation

mxsm
Copy link
Owner

@mxsm mxsm commented Nov 29, 2024

Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)

Fixes #1429

Brief Description

How Did You Test This Change?

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Introduced a new lightweight pull consumer module, enhancing messaging capabilities.
    • Added the LitePullConsumerLocal trait, providing a comprehensive interface for managing message consumption, including methods for subscribing, polling, and managing message queues.

These updates significantly improve the flexibility and efficiency of message handling within the RocketMQ client.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 29, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes introduce a new public module lite_pull_consumer in the rocketmq-client/src/consumer.rs file, along with a new trait LitePullConsumerLocal in lite_pull_consumer.rs. This trait provides a comprehensive interface for a lightweight pull consumer, including methods for managing message consumption, subscribing to topics, and handling message queues. The implementation is designed to be asynchronous and incorporates error handling.

Changes

Files Change Summary
rocketmq-client/src/consumer.rs Added new module: pub mod lite_pull_consumer;
rocketmq-client/src/consumer/lite_pull_consumer.rs Introduced LitePullConsumerLocal trait with various methods for managing lightweight pull consumer functionalities.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Implement LitePullConsumer interface for Rust (#1429)

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

feature, auto merge, ready to review, waiting-review, AI review first

Suggested reviewers

  • SpaceXCN
  • TeslaRustor

🐰 In the world of queues and streams,
A lightweight puller fulfills our dreams.
With traits and methods, it hops along,
In the RocketMQ realm, where we belong!
So let’s consume with joy and cheer,
For the lite_pull_consumer is finally here! 🎉


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@rocketmq-rust-robot rocketmq-rust-robot added this to the v0.4.0 milestone Nov 29, 2024
@rocketmq-rust-robot rocketmq-rust-robot added the feature🚀 Suggest an idea for this project. label Nov 29, 2024
@rocketmq-rust-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

🔊@mxsm 🚀Thanks for your contribution 🎉. CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first 🔥

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 4

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
rocketmq-client/src/consumer/lite_pull_consumer.rs (1)

145-145: Use std::time::Duration for timeout parameters

The poll_with_timeout method uses timeout: u64 for the timeout duration in milliseconds. Consider using std::time::Duration for better clarity, type safety, and to align with Rust conventions for handling time durations.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 799639a and eddc220.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • rocketmq-client/src/consumer.rs (1 hunks)
  • rocketmq-client/src/consumer/lite_pull_consumer.rs (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
rocketmq-client/src/consumer/lite_pull_consumer.rs (2)

17-27: Imports and module references are well-organized

The necessary modules and types are correctly imported, ensuring all dependencies are properly referenced.


29-305: Comprehensive and clear documentation

The trait methods are well-documented with clear explanations of their purpose, arguments, and return values. This enhances code readability and maintainability.

@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ pub(crate) mod consumer_impl;
pub mod default_mq_push_consumer;
pub mod default_mq_push_consumer_builder;
pub mod listener;
pub mod lite_pull_consumer;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Documentation needed for the new lite pull consumer module

The module file exists and contains a well-documented trait LitePullConsumerLocal with comprehensive documentation for each method. However, it's missing module-level documentation (//! comments) that explains the purpose and usage of the lite pull consumer feature.

  • Add module-level documentation using //! comments at the top of rocketmq-client/src/consumer/lite_pull_consumer.rs to explain:
    • The purpose of the lite pull consumer
    • When to use it over other consumer types
    • Basic usage examples
🔗 Analysis chain

LGTM! The module declaration follows the project conventions.

The new lite_pull_consumer module is appropriately placed among other consumer-related modules and follows the correct visibility level and naming conventions.

Let's verify the documentation and tests for this new module:


Let me verify if the module file exists and check its content to ensure our previous search wasn't failing due to a non-existent file:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for documentation and tests in the lite_pull_consumer module

# Check for documentation
echo "Checking for module documentation..."
rg -A 5 "^//!.*lite.*pull.*consumer" "rocketmq-client/src/consumer/lite_pull_consumer.rs" || echo "No module documentation found"

# Check for tests
echo "Checking for test module..."
rg -A 5 "^#\[cfg\(test\)\]" "rocketmq-client/src/consumer/lite_pull_consumer.rs" || echo "No test module found"

# Check for test files
echo "Checking for separate test files..."
fd -g "lite_pull_consumer*test*.rs" || echo "No separate test files found"

Length of output: 557


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if the module file exists and show its content
echo "Checking if module file exists..."
fd "lite_pull_consumer.rs" rocketmq-client/src/consumer/

echo "Showing module content if it exists..."
cat rocketmq-client/src/consumer/lite_pull_consumer.rs 2>/dev/null || echo "File not found"

Length of output: 10397

use crate::consumer::topic_message_queue_change_listener::TopicMessageQueueChangeListener;
use crate::Result;

#[trait_variant::make(MQProducer: Send)]
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Incorrect trait name in attribute macro

The #[trait_variant::make(MQProducer: Send)] attribute macro references MQProducer, but the current trait is LitePullConsumerLocal. Should this be #[trait_variant::make(LitePullConsumerLocal: Send)]?

async fn start(&self) -> Result<()>;

/// Shuts down the LitePullConsumer.
async fn shutdown(&self);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Methods that may fail should return Result<()> for error handling

The methods shutdown, unsubscribe, assign, set_sub_expression_for_assign, pause, resume, set_auto_commit, commit, and update_name_server_address do not return Result types. If these methods may encounter errors during execution, consider returning Result<()> to allow callers to handle errors appropriately.

Also applies to: 110-110, 124-124, 132-132, 170-170, 176-176, 190-190, 231-231, 282-282

Comment on lines +134 to +150
/// Polls for messages.
///
/// # Returns
///
/// * `Vec<MessageExt>` - A vector of polled messages.
async fn poll(&self) -> Vec<MessageExt>;

/// Polls for messages with a timeout.
///
/// # Arguments
///
/// * `timeout` - The timeout duration in milliseconds.
///
/// # Returns
///
/// * `Vec<MessageExt>` - A vector of polled messages.
async fn poll_with_timeout(&self, timeout: u64) -> Vec<MessageExt>;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider returning Result<Vec<MessageExt>> from poll methods

The poll and poll_with_timeout methods return Vec<MessageExt> without a Result. In case of errors during polling, there is no way to indicate failure to the caller. Consider returning Result<Vec<MessageExt>> to allow error propagation.

@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot merged commit 13da812 into main Nov 29, 2024
22 of 23 checks passed
@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot added approved PR has approved and removed ready to review waiting-review waiting review this PR labels Nov 29, 2024
@mxsm mxsm deleted the feature-1429 branch November 30, 2024 10:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
AI review first Ai review pr first approved PR has approved auto merge feature🚀 Suggest an idea for this project.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Feature🚀] Add LitePullConsumer trait for client
4 participants