Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ISSUE #1500]♻️Refactor SendMessageRequestHeaderV2🍻 #1501

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 2, 2024

Conversation

mxsm
Copy link
Owner

@mxsm mxsm commented Dec 2, 2024

Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)

Fixes #1500

Brief Description

How Did You Test This Change?

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced error handling in several methods, allowing for better management of failure conditions.
    • Introduced new method get_and_check_not_none for improved field validation and retrieval.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Updated methods to return results instead of void, ensuring errors are properly reported during decoding processes.
  • Tests

    • Added comprehensive unit tests for serialization and deserialization of message headers to validate functionality.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 2, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces significant modifications to several components within the RocketMQ remoting protocol. Key changes include updating method signatures for error handling in the CommandCustomHeader trait and related structs, allowing methods like decode_fast to return crate::Result<()> instead of void. A new method, get_and_check_not_none, is added for value retrieval from a HashMap. Additionally, the SendMessageRequestHeaderV2 struct has improved error handling in its methods, along with expanded unit tests to ensure robustness.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/command_custom_header.rs - Updated decode_fast method signature to return crate::Result<()> with default implementation.
- Added get_and_check_not_none method for field validation.
rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/header/message_operation_header/send_message_request_header_v2.rs - Updated decode_fast method to return crate::Result<()>.
- Modified from method for error handling.
- Added unit tests for serialization and deserialization.
rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/header/pull_message_request_header.rs - Updated decode_fast method signature to return crate::Result<()>.
- Modified from method to initialize topic_request field.
rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/header/pull_message_response_header.rs - Updated decode_fast method signature to return crate::Result<()>.
rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/remoting_command.rs - Modified decode_command_custom_header_fast to propagate errors using ? after decode_fast call.
- Minor formatting adjustments and comments added.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Ensure the refactor does not introduce new bugs (#1500)
Update unit tests if applicable (#1500)
Ensure the refactor does not negatively impact performance (#1500)

Possibly related issues

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

refactor, auto merge, ready to review, waiting-review, AI review first

Suggested reviewers

  • TeslaRustor
  • SpaceXCN

Poem

🐰 In the realm of code, we hop and play,
With methods refined, we brighten the day.
Errors now handled, with grace and with ease,
Our headers are strong, like the roots of a tree.
So let’s celebrate, with a joyful cheer,
For the changes we've made, bring us all near! 🌟


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@rocketmq-rust-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

🔊@mxsm 🚀Thanks for your contribution 🎉. CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first 🔥

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 2, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 80.72727% with 53 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 23.79%. Comparing base (1d13387) to head (2e5d38f).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...operation_header/send_message_request_header_v2.rs 87.74% 31 Missing ⚠️
...tmq-remoting/src/protocol/command_custom_header.rs 0.00% 17 Missing ⚠️
...src/protocol/header/pull_message_request_header.rs 0.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
...rc/protocol/header/pull_message_response_header.rs 0.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/remoting_command.rs 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1501      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   23.28%   23.79%   +0.50%     
==========================================
  Files         450      450              
  Lines       58674    58917     +243     
==========================================
+ Hits        13663    14018     +355     
+ Misses      45011    44899     -112     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/command_custom_header.rs (2)

74-79: Document the purpose of the default decode_fast implementation

The default implementation of decode_fast in the CommandCustomHeader trait returns Ok(()) without performing any actions. Consider adding documentation to clarify that this default method should be overridden by implementing types that require custom decoding logic.


90-120: Improve error handling in get_and_check_not_none method

The method get_and_check_not_none can be simplified using the cloned and ok_or_else methods for clearer error handling.

Apply this diff to enhance readability and efficiency:

- fn get_and_check_not_none(
-     &self,
-     map: &HashMap<CheetahString, CheetahString>,
-     field: &CheetahString,
- ) -> crate::Result<CheetahString> {
-     match map.get(field) {
-         Some(value) => Ok(value.clone()),
-         None => Err(crate::remoting_error::RemotingError::RemotingCommandError(
-             format!("The field {} is required.", field),
-         )),
-     }
- }
+ fn get_and_check_not_none(
+     &self,
+     map: &HashMap<CheetahString, CheetahString>,
+     field: &CheetahString,
+ ) -> crate::Result<CheetahString> {
+     map.get(field)
+         .cloned()
+         .ok_or_else(|| crate::remoting_error::RemotingError::RemotingCommandError(
+             format!("The field {} is required.", field),
+         ))
+ }
rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/header/message_operation_header/send_message_request_header_v2.rs (2)

28-28: Remove unused import if unnecessary

The import of RemotingError::RemotingCommandError is added but may not be required in this file. Ensure that this import is needed; otherwise, consider removing it to clean up the code.


Line range hint 149-206: Handle parsing errors to prevent panics in decode_fast

The decode_fast method uses parse().unwrap() when parsing fields, which can cause the application to panic if parsing fails. Replace unwrap() with proper error handling to ensure robustness.

Apply this diff to handle parsing errors safely:

- self.j = Some(v.parse().unwrap());
+ self.j = Some(v.parse().map_err(|_| RemotingCommandError("Parse field j error".to_string()))?);

- self.k = Some(
-     v.parse()
-         .map_err(|_| RemotingCommandError("Parse field k error".to_string()))?,
- );

- self.l = Some(
-     v.parse()
-         .map_err(|_| RemotingCommandError("Parse field l error".to_string()))?,
- );

- self.m = Some(
-     v.parse()
-         .map_err(|_| RemotingCommandError("Parse field m error".to_string()))?,
- );

This change ensures that any parsing errors are properly propagated as Err values.

rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/header/pull_message_response_header.rs (1)

Line range hint 137-174: Safely handle parsing in decode_fast to avoid panics

In the decode_fast method, using parse().unwrap() can lead to panics if the data cannot be parsed. Replace unwrap() with map_err to return meaningful errors and prevent the application from crashing.

Apply this diff to improve error handling:

if let Some(offset_delta) = fields.get(&CheetahString::from_static_str(Self::SUGGEST_WHICH_BROKER_ID)) {
-    self.suggest_which_broker_id = Some(offset_delta.parse().unwrap());
+    self.suggest_which_broker_id = Some(offset_delta.parse().map_err(|_| RemotingCommandError("Parse field suggestWhichBrokerId error".to_string()))?);
}

Repeat similar changes for the other fields (next_begin_offset, min_offset, etc.) to handle parsing errors appropriately.

rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/header/pull_message_request_header.rs (1)

Line range hint 214-319: Prevent application panics by handling errors in decode_fast

The use of str.parse::<i64>().unwrap() and similar statements can cause panics if parsing fails. Modify the code to handle parsing errors using map_err and return them as part of the Result.

Apply this diff to handle parsing errors safely:

- self.queue_offset = str.parse::<i64>().unwrap();
+ self.queue_offset = str.parse::<i64>().map_err(|_| RemotingCommandError("Parse field queueOffset error".to_string()))?;

- self.max_msg_nums = str.parse::<i32>().unwrap();
+ self.max_msg_nums = str.parse::<i32>().map_err(|_| RemotingCommandError("Parse field maxMsgNums error".to_string()))?;

- self.sys_flag = str.parse::<i32>().unwrap();
+ self.sys_flag = str.parse::<i32>().map_err(|_| RemotingCommandError("Parse field sysFlag error".to_string()))?;

- self.commit_offset = str.parse::<i64>().unwrap();
+ self.commit_offset = str.parse::<i64>().map_err(|_| RemotingCommandError("Parse field commitOffset error".to_string()))?;

- self.suspend_timeout_millis = str.parse::<u64>().unwrap();
+ self.suspend_timeout_millis = str.parse::<u64>().map_err(|_| RemotingCommandError("Parse field suspendTimeoutMillis error".to_string()))?;

- self.sub_version = str.parse::<i64>().unwrap();
+ self.sub_version = str.parse::<i64>().map_err(|_| RemotingCommandError("Parse field subVersion error".to_string()))?;

By handling errors, you ensure that the application remains stable even when encountering invalid input.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1d13387 and 2e5d38f.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/command_custom_header.rs (2 hunks)
  • rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/header/message_operation_header/send_message_request_header_v2.rs (4 hunks)
  • rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/header/pull_message_request_header.rs (2 hunks)
  • rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/header/pull_message_response_header.rs (2 hunks)
  • rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/remoting_command.rs (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/header/message_operation_header/send_message_request_header_v2.rs (1)

449-687: Add unit tests for error cases and edge conditions

The current unit tests cover standard serialization and deserialization scenarios. Consider adding tests that handle parsing failures, missing required fields, and invalid data to ensure the SendMessageRequestHeaderV2 struct behaves correctly under all conditions.

[unit_tests_coverage]

rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/remoting_command.rs (1)

607-607: Improve error propagation in decode_command_custom_header_fast

The addition of the ? operator after target.decode_fast(header) ensures that errors from decode_fast are properly returned to the caller. This change enhances error handling by propagating errors instead of silently ignoring them.

@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot merged commit 3ef462f into main Dec 2, 2024
25 checks passed
@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot added approved PR has approved and removed ready to review waiting-review waiting review this PR labels Dec 2, 2024
@mxsm mxsm deleted the refactor-1500 branch December 3, 2024 14:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
AI review first Ai review pr first approved PR has approved auto merge refactor♻️ refactor code
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Refactor♻️]Refactor SendMessageRequestHeaderV2
4 participants