Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update jekyll-gh-pages.yml #2491

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 1, 2025
Merged

Update jekyll-gh-pages.yml #2491

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 1, 2025

Conversation

mxsm
Copy link
Owner

@mxsm mxsm commented Feb 1, 2025

Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)

Fixes #issue_id

Brief Description

How Did You Test This Change?

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated deployment settings to broaden URL matching and adjust configuration handling, supporting more consistent site crawling and content indexing.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 1, 2025

Walkthrough

This change updates the GitHub Actions workflow configuration for deploying a Jekyll site to GitHub Pages. The modifications adjust the parameters for the Algolia crawler step within the deploy job. Specifically, the site-url parameter is revised to use a generalized URL pattern, and the override-config parameter is set from true to false.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/jekyll-gh-pages.yml Updated the site-url parameter from 'https://rocketmq-rust.ljbmxsm.com' to 'https://rocketmq-rust.ljbmxsm.com/**' and the override-config parameter from true to false in the deploy job's Algolia crawler step.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant GitHubActions as GitHub Actions
    participant DeployJob as Deploy Job
    participant AlgoliaCrawler as Algolia Crawler
    GitHubActions->>DeployJob: Trigger workflow
    DeployJob->>AlgoliaCrawler: Execute crawler setup & crawl with updated parameters
    AlgoliaCrawler-->>DeployJob: Return crawl status
Loading

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

enhancement⚡️, auto merge, ready to review, waiting-review, AI review first

Suggested reviewers

  • TeslaRustor
  • SpaceXCN
  • rocketmq-rust-bot

Poem

I'm a little bunny, hopping through code,
Tweaking URLs on my deployment road.
With override-config now set to false with glee,
Algolia crawls smooth, as happy as can be!
Here's to changes that make our workflow shine—hop, hop, hop! 🐇✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2af6bfe and 0ac8800.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/jekyll-gh-pages.yml (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (9)
  • GitHub Check: build (windows-latest, nightly)
  • GitHub Check: build (windows-latest, stable)
  • GitHub Check: build (macos-latest, nightly)
  • GitHub Check: build (macos-latest, stable)
  • GitHub Check: test
  • GitHub Check: build (ubuntu-latest, nightly)
  • GitHub Check: build
  • GitHub Check: build (ubuntu-latest, stable)
  • GitHub Check: auto-approve
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/jekyll-gh-pages.yml (2)

65-65: Verify the wildcard usage in the site-url parameter.
Changing the URL from a fixed URL to one with a wildcard ('https://rocketmq-rust.ljbmxsm.com/**') broadens the scope of URL matching. Please confirm that this pattern is intentional and supported by the Algolia crawler. In particular, ensure that it doesn’t unintentionally include unexpected pages or resources.


66-66: Confirm the new override-config setting.
The modification sets override-config to false, which will prevent the crawler from overriding its existing configuration. Verify that this change aligns with the desired crawling behavior and deployment strategy, ensuring that the crawler doesn't miss necessary configuration adjustments during a crawl.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@rocketmq-rust-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

🔊@mxsm 🚀Thanks for your contribution🎉!

💡CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first🔥!

Note

🚨The code review suggestions from CodeRabbit are to be used as a reference only, and the PR submitter can decide whether to make changes based on their own judgment. Ultimately, the project management personnel will conduct the final code review💥.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 1, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 28.62%. Comparing base (2af6bfe) to head (0ac8800).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2491   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   28.62%   28.62%           
=======================================
  Files         510      510           
  Lines       73518    73518           
=======================================
  Hits        21044    21044           
  Misses      52474    52474           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Collaborator

@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot merged commit fb651bf into main Feb 1, 2025
24 checks passed
@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot added approved PR has approved and removed ready to review waiting-review waiting review this PR labels Feb 1, 2025
@mxsm mxsm deleted the mxsm-patch-9 branch February 2, 2025 11:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
AI review first Ai review pr first approved PR has approved auto merge
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants