Skip to content

Store correlated noise amplitudes instead of the residuals #1883

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Feb 19, 2025

Conversation

abhisrkckl
Copy link
Contributor

@abhisrkckl abhisrkckl commented Feb 6, 2025

Residuals can be computed from the amplitudes easily, but vice versa is hard.

This was part of #1869, but that was getting too large and unwieldy. So I am splitting it into simpler PRs.

@abhisrkckl abhisrkckl added the awaiting review This PR needs someone to review it so it can be merged label Feb 6, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 10, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 69.84%. Comparing base (3ad5f9b) to head (23870cf).
Report is 274 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1883      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   69.78%   69.84%   +0.05%     
==========================================
  Files         110      110              
  Lines       25579    25740     +161     
  Branches     4041     4072      +31     
==========================================
+ Hits        17851    17977     +126     
- Misses       6598     6627      +29     
- Partials     1130     1136       +6     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Copy link
Member

@scottransom scottransom left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good! Thanks!

@scottransom scottransom merged commit 1d54c39 into nanograv:master Feb 19, 2025
9 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
awaiting review This PR needs someone to review it so it can be merged
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants