Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(deps): update dependency @prisma/client to v6.3.0 #14532

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 29, 2025

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Jan 28, 2025

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
@prisma/client (source) 6.2.1 -> 6.3.0 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

prisma/prisma (@​prisma/client)

v6.3.0

Compare Source

Today, we are excited to share the 6.3.0 stable release 🎉

🌟 Help us spread the word about Prisma by starring the repo ☝️ or tweeting about the release. 🌟

Highlights
Add limit to updateMany() and deleteMany()

Previously, limit has not existed as a valid option in top level updateMany() and deleteMany() queries. In 6.3.0 limit is now available in these queries, bringing their features more in line with other query types.

You can use limit like the following:

await prisma.user.deleteMany({
  where: { column: 'value' },
  limit: 100,
});

This will limit the number of deleted users to 100 at maximum.

Sort generator fields deterministically

In previous version of Prisma ORM, the fields inside of a generator block in your Prisma Schema were not deterministically sorted. This could lead to cases where prisma db pull could lead to re-ordering of fields.

In 6.3.0, the sorting of fields in this block is now deterministic. You may see re-ordering on the first prisma db pull after you upgrade, but it will remain consistent afterwards.

Replace NOT IN with NOT EXISTS for PostgreSQL relation filters

In previous versions of Prisma ORM, when using the none or some relation filters, the SQL queries generated used NOT IN. In many cases this lead to performance issues as the size of the related table grew. In 6.3.0, we’ve replaced these usages of IN with EXISTS in order to improve query performance.

A special thank you

We'd like to extend our heartfelt thanks to @​loren and his team for the collaboration and trust in our enterprise support plan. Working closely with them allowed us to address important issues like #​19249 and #​17303. Their insights and partnership have been invaluable in improving our product.

If your team could benefit from dedicated support and tailored solutions, learn more about our enterprise support plan.

Fixes and improvements
Prisma Client
Prisma
Credits

Huge thanks to @​WhyAsh5114 for their contributions to this release!


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate bot added the dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file label Jan 28, 2025
@coveralls
Copy link

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 81f95408-c4f5-4c0f-bcd1-399aca71074d

Details

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 89.702%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 634bc1dd-dcfb-47a8-88a5-bd61a7e13fdc: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 7108
Relevant Lines: 7924

💛 - Coveralls

@kamilmysliwiec kamilmysliwiec merged commit 3f196ef into master Jan 29, 2025
5 checks passed
@renovate renovate bot deleted the renovate/prisma-monorepo branch January 29, 2025 09:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants