Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: missing argument for TextProcessing Manager #39684

Merged

Conversation

kesselb
Copy link
Contributor

@kesselb kesselb commented Aug 2, 2023

  • Resolves: Failing ci / nodb test

Summary

TODO

  • ...

Checklist

@kesselb kesselb force-pushed the fix/noid/missing-argument-for-text-processing-test branch from c169943 to 773f1b5 Compare August 2, 2023 22:32
Signed-off-by: Daniel Kesselberg <mail@danielkesselberg.de>
@kesselb kesselb force-pushed the fix/noid/missing-argument-for-text-processing-test branch from 773f1b5 to 0098af3 Compare August 2, 2023 22:33
@kesselb kesselb mentioned this pull request Aug 2, 2023
4 tasks
@kesselb kesselb self-assigned this Aug 2, 2023
@kesselb kesselb added bug 3. to review Waiting for reviews labels Aug 2, 2023
@kesselb kesselb added this to the Nextcloud 28 milestone Aug 2, 2023
@kesselb kesselb requested a review from julien-nc August 2, 2023 22:53
Copy link
Member

@julien-nc julien-nc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks a lot and sorry I didn't spot it in the original PR.

@julien-nc julien-nc merged commit 9e096ef into master Aug 3, 2023
36 checks passed
@julien-nc julien-nc deleted the fix/noid/missing-argument-for-text-processing-test branch August 3, 2023 11:03
@kesselb
Copy link
Contributor Author

kesselb commented Aug 3, 2023

Thanks a lot and sorry I didn't spot it in the original PR.

You are welcome, please don't worry 😃
Everyone is just too used to the failing drone runs 🙈

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants