Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve block code coverage with more tests #205

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Dec 1, 2024
Merged

Conversation

nietras
Copy link
Owner

@nietras nietras commented Nov 30, 2024

No description provided.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 30, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 99.54%. Comparing base (ea1b165) to head (966eed2).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #205      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   99.34%   99.54%   +0.19%     
==========================================
  Files          47       47              
  Lines        3510     3512       +2     
  Branches      384      384              
==========================================
+ Hits         3487     3496       +9     
+ Misses         20       14       -6     
+ Partials        3        2       -1     
Flag Coverage Δ
Debug 99.37% <100.00%> (+0.57%) ⬆️
Release 99.83% <100.00%> (+0.28%) ⬆️
macos-latest 91.97% <100.00%> (+0.31%) ⬆️
ubuntu-latest 99.51% <100.00%> (+0.37%) ⬆️
windows-latest 99.51% <100.00%> (+0.37%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@nietras nietras merged commit 97ab8b6 into main Dec 1, 2024
35 checks passed
@nietras nietras deleted the improve-block-coverage branch December 1, 2024 13:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant