statfs: Fix definitions for s390x musl with libc 0.2.176 #2678
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Jens Reidel <adrian@travitia.xyz>
The PR description (at least the first paragraph) might be worth having in the git history (i.e. in the commit message) |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What does this PR do
This PR fixes compilation against libc 0.2.176 on
s390x-unknown-linux-musl. libc 0.2.176 fixed the definitions ofstatfsto align them with musl, see rust-lang/libc#4549 for the PR that fixed it.I'm not sure why libc is currently pinned to 0.2.175, but I tested this locally against 0.2.176 on
s390x-unknown-linux-gnuands390x-unknown-linux-musland the statfs code compiles fine for both now.Checklist:
CONTRIBUTING.md