Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update dependency textlint-rule-preset-ja-technical-writing to v12 #21

Merged

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Jan 5, 2025

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
textlint-rule-preset-ja-technical-writing ^10.0.1 -> ^12.0.0 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

textlint-ja/textlint-rule-preset-ja-technical-writing (textlint-rule-preset-ja-technical-writing)

v12.0.2

Compare Source

Patch Changes
  • dba9f59: CI: prevent snapshot release from branch

v12.0.1

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v12.0.0

Compare Source

Major Changes

v11.0.0

Compare Source

Major Changes
Patch Changes
  • 1e7958b: Node.js 16 のサポートを終了しました

  • a00b809: ⬆️ @​textlint-rule/textlint-rule-no-invalid-control-character@v3

    • Node.js 18+が必要になります。

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@masarakki masarakki merged commit 6be5fb7 into master Jan 6, 2025
4 checks passed
@masarakki masarakki deleted the renovate/textlint-rule-preset-ja-technical-writing-12.x branch January 6, 2025 00:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant