feat: NORA Core Device (SOFIE-1377)

[jstarpl]

• What kind of change does this PR introduce? (Bug fix, feature, docs update, ...)

Feature

• What is the current behavior? (You can also link to an open issue here)

• What is the new behavior (if this is a feature change)?

This implements a bespoke NORA Core device.

• Other information:

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Base: 30.24% // Head: 29.81% // Decreases project coverage by -0.43% ⚠️

Coverage data is based on head (58b0c83) compared to base (9a43f95).
Patch coverage: 2.85% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

📣 This organization is not using Codecov’s GitHub App Integration. We recommend you install it so Codecov can continue to function properly for your repositories. Learn more

Additional details and impacted files

@@              Coverage Diff              @@
##           release48     #239      +/-   ##
=============================================
- Coverage      30.24%   29.81%   -0.43%     
=============================================
  Files             58       59       +1     
  Lines           8548     8688     +140     
  Branches        2159     2186      +27     
=============================================
+ Hits            2585     2590       +5     
- Misses          5436     5563     +127     
- Partials         527      535       +8     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
...ckages/timeline-state-resolver-types/src/device.ts	100.00% <ø> (ø)
...e-state-resolver/src/integrations/noraNRK/index.ts	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...ackages/timeline-state-resolver-types/src/index.ts	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
packages/timeline-state-resolver/src/conductor.ts	81.32% <100.00%> (+0.23%)	⬆️

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[Julusian]

It would be good to have a type field here. This is something that becomes required with the json schemas in r49

[nytamin]

Notes after a talk with Jan:

The idea of this initial implementation is to have feature-parity with the old httpSend device. As such, I think this is a good-enough implementation :)

We also talked about the next step where the device would be listening to the actual state of Nora, and I also think that is a good implementation plan.

[jstarpl]

Since the use case for this PR has been resolved in another way, the decision has been made to mothball this PR as a draft.