[#808] Retrieve unarchived RIM bundle for provision #829
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
chubtub
changed the title
chubtub
force-pushed
the
v3_issue-808
branch
from
e2fc120
to
e60148c
Compare
…rchived bundle with later creation date. Delete RIM files with /delete endpoint, do not archive. Revert changes to ReferenceManifestPageController. Revert changes to FirmwareScvValidator class
…sioning Handle replacement base and support RIMs in their respective logic blocks
chubtub
force-pushed
the
v3_issue-808
branch
from
8ffd9aa
to
c37dd12
Compare
iadgovuser26
approved these changes
Sep 25, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The two main changes included here are:
This PR also attempted to address the use cases where a good or bad RIM bundle is sent with an initial provision and then replaced by the other. This grew beyond the scope of this PR and will be handled in a future issue.
Closes #808