-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 24
Apply PR suggestions for #273 #286
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
2c3b18b to
e46a6a6
Compare
e46a6a6 to
aad5942
Compare
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## alpha #286 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 80.99% 81.74% +0.75%
==========================================
Files 36 36
Lines 1021 1063 +42
Branches 110 119 +9
==========================================
+ Hits 827 869 +42
Misses 186 186
Partials 8 8
... and 7 files with indirect coverage changes 📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here. |
aad5942 to
cb258e4
Compare
dfc1aca to
dcc741b
Compare
4ca142b to
e6f7d0a
Compare
e6f7d0a to
b11f1d4
Compare
src/conditions/context/context.ts
Outdated
|
|
||
| public static fromConditions( | ||
| provider: ethers.providers.Provider, | ||
| conditions: Conditions, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
| conditions: Conditions, | |
| conditions: WASMConditions, |
Probably not relevant at all, but this argument is for WASMCondition, right?
If this suggestion is accepted, we should remove the line 2 of this file, the import of Conditions
|
LGTM! ✌️ But I left a nitpicky question |
12768d1 to
822ac79
Compare
822ac79 to
363718f
Compare
derekpierre
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🎸
Type of PR:
Required reviews:
What this does:
nucypher-core@0.12.0#273nucypher-core#269nucypher-core::Conditionsusage #293