Skip to content
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
80 changes: 80 additions & 0 deletions packages/coq-lsp/coq-lsp.0.2.4+9.1/opam
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
synopsis: "Language Server Protocol native server for Coq"
description:
"""
Language Server Protocol native server for Coq
"""
opam-version: "2.0"
maintainer: "e@x80.org"
bug-reports: "https://github.com/ejgallego/coq-lsp/issues"
homepage: "https://github.com/ejgallego/coq-lsp"
dev-repo: "git+https://github.com/ejgallego/coq-lsp.git"
authors: [
"Emilio Jesús Gallego Arias <e@x80.org>"
"Ali Caglayan <alizter@gmail.com>"
"Shachar Itzhaky <shachari@cs.technion.ac.il>"
"Ramkumar Ramachandra <r@artagnon.com>"
]
license: "LGPL-2.1-or-later"
doc: "https://ejgallego.github.io/coq-lsp/"

depends: [

("ocaml" {>= "5.0"} | ("ocaml" {<= "5.0"} & "memprof-limits" { >= "0.2.1" } ))

"dune" { >= "3.13.0" } # Version interval [3.8-3.12] was
# broken for composed builds with Coq

# lsp dependencies
"cmdliner" { >= "1.1.0" }
"yojson" { >= "1.7.0" }
"uri" { >= "4.2.0" }
"dune-build-info" { >= "3.2.0" }

# coq-layout-printer
"tyxml" { >= "4.5.0" }

# for waterproof json parser
"menhir" { >= "20220210" }

# unit testing
"ppx_inline_test" { >= "v0.15.0" }

# This is now a hard dep due to API changes in 1.9.7
"ocamlfind" { >= "1.9.8" }

# Rocq
"rocq-core" { >= "9.1" < "9.2" }
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

AFAICS, this requires a rocq-core version not yet released to the opam-repo, thus causing Failed - Everything was skipped and coq-lsp.0.2.4+9.1 (failed: [SKIP] Package not available) on all workflows.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Indeed, it seems Rocq 9.1 didn't reach the opam archive yet. I'll rebase and ping once that happens.

"rocq-stdlib" { >= "9" & with-test }

# serlib deps
"ppx_deriving" { >= "5.2" }
"ppx_deriving_yojson" { >= "3.7.0" }
"ppx_import" { >= "1.11.0" }
"sexplib" { >= "v0.15.0" & < "v0.18" }
"ppx_sexp_conv" { >= "v0.15.0" & < "v0.18" }
"ppx_compare" { >= "v0.15.0" & < "v0.18" }
"ppx_hash" { >= "v0.15.0" & < "v0.18" }
]

# older results get in mess with ppx_deriving, we cannot control how
# it gets pulled, often in min-bound rev-dep, so we conflict with it
conflicts: [ "result" { < "1.5" } ]

depopts: ["lwt" "logs"]

build: [
[ "rm" "-rf" "vendor" ]
[ "dune" "build" "-p" name "-j" jobs ]
]
run-test: [ [ "dune" "runtest" "-p" name "-j" jobs ] ]

x-maintenance-intent: [ "(latest)" ]
url {
src:
"https://github.com/ejgallego/coq-lsp/releases/download/0.2.4%2B9.1/coq-lsp-0.2.4.9.1.tbz"
checksum: [
"sha256=667908bdd88f0bb1b75d2fa76a483006d600c9422a2a15297a172e62c0415cad"
"sha512=42f8e5ad308702f77c9dc40243acd2e656b16bdb94c302306dbb87387cc36941deccd5f52c18d1a045467030ddf86528b22819522a647eee5b9e1ac25f4a9560"
]
}
x-commit-hash: "3a749b285f42de753123b0df8fff600442372d61"
Loading