feat: update readme.md #512
Conversation
WalkthroughThe recent update to the OKP4 project's documentation introduces a new section designed to engage the community more deeply. It emphasizes the importance of active participation, inviting users to contribute through issues, pull requests, and joining discussions, thereby nurturing a collaborative environment. Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| Device | URL |
|---|---|
| desktop | http://localhost:4173/ |
| Device | URL |
|---|---|
| mobile | http://localhost:4173/ |
Not what you expected? Are your scores flaky? GitHub runners could be the cause.
Try running on Foo instead
ccamel
force-pushed
the
feat/readme-update-community
branch
from
3fa0d1b to
02ff531
Compare
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (1)
- README.md (1 hunks)
Additional comments: 2
README.md (2)
- 84-93: The new section inviting community involvement is clear and encouraging. It provides actionable steps for contributors and links to the Community Repository.
- 94-94: Please verify that the links to 'Contributing' and 'Code of conduct' are accessible and correctly point to the intended resources.
Verification successful
The shell script executed to verify the accessibility of the 'Contributing' and 'Code of Conduct' links did not produce any output. This means that the
grep "200 OK"command did not find a 200 OK response in the headers returned by thecurlcommand for either link. This could indicate that the links are not accessible or that thecurlcommand did not work as expected.To further investigate, I will generate a new shell script to check the HTTP status codes without filtering for "200 OK", as this will provide the actual status codes returned by the server for both URLs.
The output from the shell scripts confirms that both the 'Contributing' and 'Code of Conduct' links are accessible, with each returning a 200 HTTP status code. This indicates that the links are correctly pointing to the intended resources and are accessible.
Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the Contributing link. curl --head --silent https://github.com/okp4/.github/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md | grep "200 OK" # Verify the Code of Conduct link. curl --head --silent https://github.com/okp4/.github/blob/main/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md | grep "200 OK"Length of output: 196
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the HTTP status code for the Contributing link. curl -o /dev/null -s -w "%{http_code}\n" https://github.com/okp4/.github/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md # Check the HTTP status code for the Code of Conduct link. curl -o /dev/null -s -w "%{http_code}\n" https://github.com/okp4/.github/blob/main/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.mdLength of output: 212
Update README file with community
Summary by CodeRabbit