This file may contain code that does not follow standard best practices. This is intentional to preserve the original Codewars challenge logic, ensuring that renaming or refactoring does not break existing solutions.
Some Codewars tasks specify certain structures or naming conventions that, if changed, could break the solution logic.
E.g., sum() instead of Sum(), total_goals instead of TotalGoals.
These challenges are often approached from an automated testing perspective, where readability and simplicity take priority over performance or strict design patterns.
Below are examples demonstrating two different approaches, one that prioritizes readability and another that focuses on performance.
Example (Readability-Oriented LINQ):
public static BigInteger[] PowersOfTwo(int n)
{
return Enumerable
.Range(0, n + 1)
.Select(i => BigInteger.Pow(2, i))
.ToArray();
}public static string RepeatString(int n, string s) => string.Concat(Enumerable.Repeat(s, n));Example (For Maximum Performance):
public static BigInteger[] PowersOfTwo_ForLoop(int n)
{
var result = new BigInteger[n + 1];
for (int i = 0; i <= n; i++)
{
result[i] = BigInteger.Pow(2, i);
}
return result;
}public static string RepeatStr(int n, string s)
{
if (n <= 0 || string.IsNullOrEmpty(s))
return string.Empty;
var sb = new StringBuilder();
for (int i = 0; i < n; i++)
{
sb.Append(s);
}
return sb.ToString();
}Certain challenges explicitly require the logic to be implemented in specific ways, which may not always be the most efficient approach.
Example (RegEx Condition In Challenge):
public static int LowercaseCountCheck(string s) => Regex.Matches(s, "[a-z]").Count;Example (Better Way):
public static int LowercaseCountCheck(string s) => s.Count(char.IsLower);