connectivity custom dns configuration remove other tab add for custom dns #505
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request modifies the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
✨ Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/components/ResourceInstance/Connectivity/Connectivity.jsx (1)
Line range hint
101-143: Clean architectural changes for custom DNS handling.The refactoring improves the code by:
- Simplifying the custom DNS configuration flow
- Maintaining consistency between primary and other resources
- Using proper optional chaining for type safety
- Keeping the changes focused and minimal
Consider documenting the custom DNS data structure in prop-types or TypeScript interfaces for better maintainability.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/components/ResourceInstance/Connectivity/Connectivity.jsx(4 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/components/ResourceInstance/Connectivity/Connectivity.jsx (3)
101-101: LGTM! Clean implementation of custom DNS data passing.The direct passing of customDNSData using optional chaining is a safe and clean approach.
143-143: Verify useMemo dependencies completeness.While adding
globalEndpoints?.primary?.customDNSEndpointis correct, consider if we also need to track changes tocustomDNSEndpointfrom other resources.Let's verify the dependency requirements:
✅ Verification successful
The useMemo dependency is correctly implemented ✅
The dependency on
globalEndpoints?.primary?.customDNSEndpointis sufficient as it's the only customDNS value used in the memoized calculation. Other customDNS values are passed down to child components and don't affect this calculation.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for customDNS-related state updates that might affect rendering rg -l 'customDNS|DNS' --type jsLength of output: 270
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check Connectivity component implementation ast-grep --pattern 'const Connectivity = ({ $$ }) => { $$$ }' src/components/ResourceInstance/Connectivity/Connectivity.jsx # Check for customDNS-related props and state rg -A 5 'customDNS|DNS' src/components/ResourceInstance/Connectivity/Connectivity.jsxLength of output: 971
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check additionalEndpoints structure and usage rg -B 5 -A 10 'additionalEndpoints.*=' src/components/ResourceInstance/Connectivity/Connectivity.jsx # Check how customDNS is passed to component rg -B 2 -A 2 '<Connectivity' --type jsLength of output: 1295
Line range hint
111-126: Verify the ports prop implementation.While the customDNSData implementation is correct, there appears to be an inconsistency in how the ports prop is handled:
- For primary resources, we pass
primaryResourcePorts?.ports- For other resources, we pass
otherResourceFilteredPortsdirectlyThis might cause type mismatches or rendering issues.
Let's verify the ports data structure:
Summary by CodeRabbit