Update [serviceId].js

[nihalmohammed18]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Refactor
  • Updated data cloning method in form submission process
  • Simplified object cloning logic using a different Lodash utility function

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@nihalmohammed18 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 19 minutes and 4 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d5e9d99 and ceeb3ff.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• pages/access/service/[serviceId].js (1 hunks)

Walkthrough

The pull request involves a modification in the pages/access/service/[serviceId].js file, specifically changing the import of a lodash utility function from cloneDeep to deepClone. The change affects the object cloning mechanism in the onSubmit method of the createformik function, simplifying the data cloning process by directly applying deep cloning to the entire values object instead of conditionally cloning requestParams.

Changes

File	Change Summary
pages/access/service/[serviceId].js	- Updated lodash import from cloneDeep to deepClone - Modified onSubmit method to use deepClone on entire values object

Note: No sequence diagram is generated as the changes are primarily related to import and cloning method modifications without significant control flow alterations.

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)

pages/access/service/[serviceId].js (1)

Line range hint 794-947: Consider refactoring form submission logic for better maintainability.

The form submission logic contains complex type conversions and validations mixed together. Consider these improvements:

1. Extract type conversion logic into a separate utility function
2. Use a schema validation library like Yup for form validation
3. Implement consistent error handling patterns

Example refactor for type conversion:

// utils/typeConversion.js
export const convertFieldType = (value, type) => {
  switch (type) {
    case "Number":
      return Number(value);
    case "Float64":
      const output = Number(value);
      if (Number.isNaN(output)) {
        throw new Error(`Invalid number format`);
      }
      return output;
    case "Boolean":
      return value === "true";
    default:
      return value;
  }
};

// In your component
const convertedData = {
  ...data,
  requestParams: Object.fromEntries(
    Object.entries(data.requestParams).map(([key, value]) => {
      const schema = schemaArray.find(param => param.key === key);
      return [key, convertFieldType(value, schema?.type)];
    })
  )
};

🧰 Tools

🪛 Biome (1.9.4)

[error] 792-793: This property value named enableReinitialize is later overwritten by an object member with the same name.

Overwritten with this value.

If an object property with the same name is defined multiple times (except when combining a getter with a setter), only the last definition makes it into the object and previous definitions are ignored.
Unsafe fix: Remove this property value named enableReinitialize

(lint/suspicious/noDuplicateObjectKeys)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b434c19 and d5e9d99.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• pages/access/service/[serviceId].js (2 hunks)