feat(docs): Laminar integration

[tembo]

Description

Adds comprehensive integration documentation for Laminar x Kernel, detailing usage with Playwright, Browser Use, and Stagehand.

Changes

Introduced integrations/laminar.mdx with setup, API key, and code examples. Updated docs.json and overview.mdx.

Want me to make any changes? Add a review or comment with @tembo and i'll get back to work!

[tembo]

Requesting review from @juecd who has experience with the following files modified in this PR:

• docs.json
• integrations/overview.mdx

[mesa-dot-dev]

Mesa Description

Description

Adds comprehensive integration documentation for Laminar x Kernel, detailing usage with Playwright, Browser Use, and Stagehand.

Changes

• Added integrations/laminar.mdx: New documentation page detailing the setup, API key configuration, and code examples for integrating Laminar for observability and tracing.
• Updated integrations/overview.mdx: Added Laminar to the list of available integrations to improve discoverability.
• Updated docs.json: Registered the new documentation page in the site's navigation structure.

Want me to make any changes? Add a review or comment with @tembo and i'll get back to work!

^{Description generated by Mesa. Update settings}

[mesa-dot-dev]

Performed full review of 0e4982e...e188b07

Analysis

1. The PR focuses heavily on documentation rather than implementation code, which may lead to implementation details being overlooked or inconsistently applied across the different integration paths (Playwright, Browser Use, Stagehand).

2. Environment variables are used for API key management, but there's no mention of secure storage solutions or rotation policies which could lead to security vulnerabilities.

3. While the documentation covers multiple frameworks, this approach may create maintenance challenges when either Laminar or the browser service evolves, requiring updates across multiple integration paths.

4. The integration relies on Chrome DevTools Protocol (CDP), which could introduce compatibility issues if browser vendors change their CDP implementations or if users need to work with non-Chromium browsers.

5. The PR appears to add observability capabilities, but it's unclear if there's proper error handling and fallback mechanisms for when the observability platform is unavailable.

Tip

Help

Configure your agents

Mesa Docs

Slash Commands:

• /review - Request a full code review
• /review latest - Review only changes since the last review
• /describe - Generate PR description. This will update the PR body or issue comment depending on your configuration
• /help - Get help with Mesa commands and configuration options

^{3 files reviewed | 0 comments | Edit Agent Settings}

[mesa-dot-dev]

Performed full review of 0e4982e...e188b07

Analysis

1. Model naming inconsistencies may lead to runtime errors when users implement the integration
2. Documentation lacks complete setup instructions, assuming users are already familiar with both platforms
3. Code examples may not align with current API versions, potentially causing implementation issues
4. While observability and tracing capabilities are included, the specifics of proper instrumentation across the multiple frameworks could be more clearly defined

Tip

Help

Configure your agents

Mesa Docs

Slash Commands:

• /review - Request a full code review
• /review latest - Review only changes since the last review
• /describe - Generate PR description. This will update the PR body or issue comment depending on your configuration
• /help - Get help with Mesa commands and configuration options

^{3 files reviewed | 0 comments | Edit Agent Settings}

[dprevoznik]

@tembo can you make the following changes:

1. Remove the targetted instrumentation example from python
2. Use uv pip install for Python
3. Can you ensure that you are using combined code blocks instead of having the code blocks be separate? When they are combined they appear in separate tabs.
4. Add an additional Step to the Laminar API key section before step 3 that will tell the person to generate an API key in the project.
5. Please use combined code blocks for the integration guides by framework section at the bottom. JavaScript and Python for each section should be in a code block.
6. Replace the content currently in the “Why use Laminar with Kernel?” section with the content that’s now in the “Benefits of Laminar x Kernel” section. Move that material from lower up to the top and then remove the section at the bottom.
7. The laminar evalutions link in the bottom should be: https://docs.lmnr.ai/evaluations/introduction

[tembo]

@tembo can you make the following changes:

1. Remove the targetted instrumentation example from python
2. Use uv pip install for Python
3. Can you ensure that you are using combined code blocks instead of having the code blocks be separate? When they are combined they appear in separate tabs.
4. Add an additional Step to the Laminar API key section before step 3 that will tell the person to generate an API key in the project.
5. Please use combined code blocks for the integration guides by framework section at the bottom. JavaScript and Python for each section should be in a code block.
6. Replace the content currently in the “Why use Laminar with Kernel?” section with the content that’s now in the “Benefits of Laminar x Kernel” section. Move that material from lower up to the top and then remove the section at the bottom.
7. The laminar evalutions link in the bottom should be: https://docs.lmnr.ai/evaluations/introduction

Thanks @dprevoznik! I've made all requested changes:

1. Removed targeted instrumentation example from Python
2. Updated to uv pip install for Python
3. Combined code blocks with tabs for JavaScript/Python
4. Added a step to generate an API key in the project
5. Combined code blocks in the framework integration sections
6. Replaced "Why use Laminar with Kernel?" content with what was in the "Benefits" section and removed the latter
7. Updated the Laminar evaluations link to https://docs.lmnr.ai/evaluations/introduction

[dprevoznik]

@tembo this is the format of a code block for both python and typescript versions, where they aren't in separate blocks but just separate tabs:

"

import Kernel from '@onkernel/sdk';

const kernel = new Kernel();

const kernelBrowser = await kernel.browsers.create();
console.log(kernelBrowser.session_id);

from kernel import Kernel

kernel = Kernel()

kernel_browser = kernel.browsers.create()
print(kernel_browser.session_id)

"

[tembo]

@tembo this is the format of a code block for both python and typescript versions, where they aren't in separate blocks but just separate tabs:

"

import Kernel from '@onkernel/sdk';

const kernel = new Kernel();

const kernelBrowser = await kernel.browsers.create();
console.log(kernelBrowser.session_id);

from kernel import Kernel

kernel = Kernel()

kernel_browser = kernel.browsers.create()
print(kernel_browser.session_id)

"

@dprevoznik Thanks for the format clarification! I've updated the code blocks to use the <CodeGroup> wrapper with separate language tabs as requested. The change has been applied to all code examples throughout the document to maintain consistent formatting.

[dprevoznik]

@tembo change "Integration guides by framework" to "Browser Agent Framework Examples" and list the available frameworks below with anchor tags to jump to that position.

[tembo]

@tembo change "Integration guides by framework" to "Browser Agent Framework Examples" and list the available frameworks below with anchor tags to jump to that position.

I've changed "Integration guides by framework" to "Browser Agent Framework Examples" and added anchor links for each framework as requested. The framework options (Playwright, Browser Use, and Stagehand) are now listed below the heading with jump links to their respective sections.

[masnwilliams]

lgtm