Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: update README Eigen version and add {fmt} dependency #254

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

DhruvJ22
Copy link

Updated README to be consistent with the Eigen version stated in the development docker file and to add the explicit dependence on fmt.

@@ -225,7 +225,8 @@ Benchmarks are pushed to the [GitHub pages](https://open-space-collective.github
| ----------- | --------- | ------------------ | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |
| Pybind11 | `2.10.1` | BSD-3-Clause | [github.com/pybind/pybind11](https://github.com/pybind/pybind11) |
| ordered-map | `0.6.0` | MIT | [github.com/Tessil/ordered-map](https://github.com/Tessil/ordered-map) |
| Eigen | `3.3.7` | MPL2 | [eigen.tuxfamily.org](http://eigen.tuxfamily.org/index.php) |
| {fmt} | `5.2.0` | BSD-2-Clause | [github.com/fmtlib/fmt](https://github.com/fmtlib/fmt) |
Copy link
Contributor

@lucas-bremond lucas-bremond Oct 17, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for updating! Actually, fmt is already listed as an OSTk Core dependency this is why it isn't duplicated here.

However, the Eigen version bump is valid, thanks for spotting that!

Copy link
Author

@DhruvJ22 DhruvJ22 Oct 17, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for your comment!

OTSK-physics and OTSK-mathematics lists core and {fmt} as a dependency, hence I suggested the change to be consistent with other repos.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Whoops, that's likely an oversight! Let's summon @Derollez and @robinpdm to see what they think.

Copy link
Contributor

@robinpdm robinpdm Oct 19, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good point. If we want these lists to match the Dockerfiles, then indeed we may want to add {fmt} here? Or should they rather match CMakeLists?

@DhruvJ22 DhruvJ22 closed this Feb 5, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants